• Football
• Belgium
• Challenger Pro League
• K.A.S. Eupen x RFC Seraing

K.A.S. Eupen vs RFC Seraing 20/03/2026

• 20/03/26 15:00 |
  Round 31
• K.A.S. Eupen
  • 0 : 0
  • Finished
  RFC Seraing

Summary Statistics Player Statistics

EUP

Match details

SER

1st Half 0:0

28 K.A.S. Eupen

33 RFC Seraing

2nd Half 0:0

59 RFC Seraing

71 K.A.S. Eupen

71 K.A.S. Eupen

83 RFC Seraing

83 RFC Seraing

83 K.A.S. Eupen

83 K.A.S. Eupen

90 + 2 K.A.S. Eupen

EUP

Match stats

SER

0.11

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

1.23

49 %

Ball possession

51 %

0

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

1

3

Total shots

13

1

Shots on goal

6

0.08

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.53

45 %

Ball possession

55 %

2

Total shots

5

1

Shots on goal

2

1

Shots off goal

2

0.03

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.7

54 %

Ball possession

46 %

0

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

1

1

Total shots

8

0

Shots on goal

4

• 1.5 1.1 1.3
• Goals scored per match
• 1.5 1.2 1.5

• 1.1 1.3 1.2
• Goals conceded per match
• 1.2 1.3 0.9

• 34.6' 37.5' 36'
• Minutes/Goal scored
• 33.3' 36' 37.5'

• 2.6 2.4 2.5
• Match goals average
• 2.7 2.5 2.4

• 26 24 25
• Goals
• 27 25 24

Show more

Current Form

Last 5 matches

K.A.S. Eupen

RFC Seraing

EUP

H2H Stats

SER

All tournaments Challenger Pro League Pro League Beker van Belgie Club Friendly Games 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches 5 matches 5 matches

• 80% 4wins
• 20% 1draws
• 0wins

• 6
• Score
• 2

• 1
• Yellow cards
• 3

• 0
• Red cards
• 0

Head to head

Belgium Challenger Pro League 4

FT 20/03/26 15:00

K.A.S. Eupen RFC Seraing

0 0

FT 05/12/25 14:00

RFC Seraing K.A.S. Eupen

0 1

FT 12/04/25 10:00

K.A.S. Eupen RFC Seraing

2 1

FT 05/10/24 14:00

RFC Seraing K.A.S. Eupen

1 2

Belgium Pro League 1

FT 23/12/22 12:30

RFC Seraing K.A.S. Eupen

0 1

Load more

Last results: K.A.S. Eupen

Belgium Challenger Pro League 5

FT 17/04/26 14:00

Liege K.A.S. Eupen

2 1

FT 10/04/26 14:00

K.A.S. Eupen Beerschot

3 3

FT 04/04/26 14:00

NXT K.A.S. Eupen

0 1

FT 20/03/26 15:00

K.A.S. Eupen RFC Seraing

0 0

FT 13/03/26 15:00

RSC Anderlecht Futures K.A.S. Eupen

0 1

Load more

Last results: RFC Seraing

World Club Friendly Games 1

FT 24/04/26 08:00

Francs Borains RFC Seraing

4 2

Belgium Challenger Pro League 4

FT 17/04/26 14:00

RFC Seraing S.K. Beveren

1 2

FT 10/04/26 14:00

Lokeren Oost-Vlaanderen RFC Seraing

1 1

FT 05/04/26 10:00

RFC Seraing Patro Eisden Maasmechelen

2 0

FT 20/03/26 15:00

K.A.S. Eupen RFC Seraing

0 0

Load more

Match news

PSG Talent Zague in Danish Court for Speeding: Harsh Verdict Looms

21.04.2026 06:56

Eupen Fires Back at Stijnen After Wild Pitch Brawl

19.12.2025 09:52

De Ridder Keeps Feet on Ground After Stunner

19.12.2025 02:46

Qatar Sports Investments Eyes KAS Eupen Takeover

09.12.2025 09:31

Zaragoza Faces Aspire's Cultural Leonesa Revival

17.10.2025 14:02

Lukaku Brothers Boycott Dad's Funeral Amid DRC Feud

15.10.2025 10:02

Load more

Match facts

The most common result of matches between KAS Eupen and RFC Seraing is 0-0. 4 matches have ended with this result.

During the last 11 meetings with KAS Eupen playing at home, KAS Eupen have won 5 times, there have been 3 draws while RFC Seraing have won 3 times. The goal difference is 17-16 in favour of KAS Eupen.

During the last 21 meetings, KAS Eupen have won 11 times, there have been 6 draws while RFC Seraing have won 4 times. The goal difference is 31-22 in favour of KAS Eupen.

Last season KAS Eupen won both games against RFC Seraing (2-1 at home and 2-1 away).

RFC Seraing have a winning streak of 3 matches in Challenger Pro League.

Did you know that KAS Eupen scores 23% of their goals between the minutes 31-45?

Did you know that RFC Seraing scores 27% of their goals between the minutes 76-90?

RFC Seraing have a winning streak of 3 matches.

RFC Seraing have a winning streak of 3 matches away from home.

RFC Seraing haven't won any of their last 4 games against KAS Eupen.

KAS Eupen haven't scored in 2 of their 14 home matches in Challenger Pro League this season.

RFC Seraing haven't scored in 7 of their 14 away matches in Challenger Pro League this season.

KAS Eupen wins 1st half in 32% of their matches, RFC Seraing in 10% of their matches.

KAS Eupen wins 32% of halftimes, RFC Seraing wins 10%.

The winner of their last meeting was KAS Eupen.

On their last meeting KAS Eupen won by 1 goals.

When KAS Eupen leads 1-0 at home, they win in 83% of their matches.

When RFC Seraing leads 0-1 away, they win in 57% of their matches.

When KAS Eupen is down 0-1 home, they win 0% of their matches.

When RFC Seraing is down 1-0 away, they win 0% of their matches.

In Challenger Pro League, RFC Seraing has better performance than KAS Eupen.

RFC Seraing's performance of the last 5 matches is better than KAS Eupen's.

KAS Eupen have lost just 1 of their last 5 games against RFC Seraing (in all competitions).

In the last 5 meetings KAS Eupen won 4, RFC Seraing won 1, 0 draws.

KAS Eupen have lost just 0 of their last 5 Challenger Pro League games against RFC Seraing.

RFC Seraing have won just 0 of their last 5 Challenger Pro League games against KAS Eupen.

KAS Eupen scores 1.4 goals in a match against RFC Seraing and RFC Seraing scores 1 goals against KAS Eupen (on average).

Average number of goals in meetings between KAS Eupen and RFC Seraing is 2.4.

Average number of goals in the first half in meetings between KAS Eupen and RFC Seraing is 1.

KAS Eupen scores 1.39 goals when playing at home and RFC Seraing scores 0.95 goals when playing away (on average).

RFC Seraing haven't lost in their last 4 games.

More facts

New comments

Add your message

Be the first to leave a comment

See All

EUP

Statistics

SER

Match stats Prematch

Match

1st Half

2nd Half

0.11

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

1.23

49 %

Ball possession

51 %

0

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

1

3

Total shots

13

1

Shots on goal

6

2

Shots off goal

4

1

Shots inside the Box

7

2

Shots outside the Box

6

0.12

xG on target (xGOT) xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

1.09

0

Blocked shots

3

11

Touches in the opposition Box

21

4

Offsides

2

6

Free kicks

12

4

Corner kicks

7

16

Throw ins

25

333/399 (83%)

Passes

337/395 (85%)

16/38 (42%)

Long Passes

44/68 (65%)

48/85 (56%)

Passes in final third

79/107 (74%)

1/11 (9%)

Crosses

6/28 (21%)

0.36

Expected assists (xA) Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

1.17

12

Fouls

6

1

Yellow cards

1

30

Duels won

34

7/12 (58%)

Tackles

6/10 (60%)

34

Clearances

17

10

Interceptions

12

5

Goalkeeper saves

1

1.09

xGOT faced xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.

0.12

1.09

Goals prevented Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

0.12

0.08

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.53

45 %

Ball possession

55 %

2

Total shots

5

1

Shots on goal

2

1

Shots off goal

2

1

Shots inside the Box

3

1

Shots outside the Box

2

0.12

xG on target (xGOT) xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

0.27

0

Blocked shots

1

4

Touches in the opposition Box

10

2

Offsides

1

4

Free kicks

4

1

Corner kicks

3

7

Throw ins

17

168/202 (83%)

Passes

203/236 (86%)

8/24 (33%)

Long Passes

22/34 (65%)

12/30 (40%)

Passes in final third

45/56 (80%)

0/4 (0%)

Crosses

3/16 (19%)

0.03

Expected assists (xA) Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

0.66

4

Fouls

4

0

Yellow cards

1

11

Duels won

12

1/2 (50%)

Tackles

0/1 (0%)

14

Clearances

5

7

Interceptions

5

2

Goalkeeper saves

1

0.27

xGOT faced xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.

0.12

0.27

Goals prevented Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

0.12

0.03

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.7

54 %

Ball possession

46 %

0

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

1

1

Total shots

8

0

Shots on goal

4

1

Shots off goal

2

0

Shots inside the Box

4

1

Shots outside the Box

4

0

xG on target (xGOT) xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

0.82

0

Blocked shots

2

7

Touches in the opposition Box

11

2

Offsides

1

2

Free kicks

8

3

Corner kicks

4

9

Throw ins

8

165/197 (84%)

Passes

134/159 (84%)

8/14 (57%)

Long Passes

22/34 (65%)

36/55 (65%)

Passes in final third

34/51 (67%)

1/7 (14%)

Crosses

3/12 (25%)

0.33

Expected assists (xA) Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

0.51

8

Fouls

2

1

Yellow cards

0

19

Duels won

22

6/10 (60%)

Tackles

6/9 (67%)

20

Clearances

12

3

Interceptions

7

3

Goalkeeper saves

0

0.82

xGOT faced xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.

0

0.82

Goals prevented Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

0

Home Away Overall Home Away Overall

10 Matches

4 - Wins

3 - Draws

3 - Losses

10 Matches

4 - Wins

2 - Draws

4 - Losses

10 Matches

3 - Wins

3 - Draws

4 - Losses

10 Matches

Wins - 3

Draws - 4

Losses - 3

10 Matches

Wins - 3

Draws - 3

Losses - 4

10 Matches

Wins - 4

Draws - 4

Losses - 2

Goal Difference

+4

15

11

-2

11

13

+1

13

12

scored

conceded

+3

15

12

-1

12

13

+6

15

9

• 1.5 1.1 1.3
• Goals scored per match
• 1.5 1.2 1.5

• 1.1 1.3 1.2
• Goals conceded per match
• 1.2 1.3 0.9

• 34.6' 37.5' 36'
• Minutes/Goal scored
• 33.3' 36' 37.5'

• 2.6 2.4 2.5
• Match goals average
• 2.7 2.5 2.4

• 26 24 25
• Goals
• 27 25 24

Goals scored

K.A.S. Eupen is +14% Better in terms of Goals scored.

EUP

1.39 Goals / match

SER

1.22 Goals / match

Full time

1st Half / 2nd Half

Scored per game

EUP SER

Over 0.5

86%

67%

Over 1.5

39%

33%

Over 2.5

11%

15%

Over 3.5

4%

7%

Failed to score

14%

33%

scored 1st/2nd Half

EUP SER

Scored in 1H

46%

30%

Scored in 2H

54%

56%

Scored in both halves

14%

19%

Scored average 1H

0.68

0.37

Scored average 2H

0.71

0.85

Statistics of K.A.S. Eupen matches and RFC Seraing matches within the tournament Challenger Pro League.

Goals conceded

K.A.S. Eupen is +27% Better in terms of Goals conceded.

EUP 1.11 Conceded / match

SER 1.41 Conceded / match

Full time

1st Half / 2nd Half

Conceded / game

EUP SER

Over 0.5

64%

74%

Over 1.5

36%

48%

Over 2.5

11%

11%

Over 3.5

0%

4%

Clean sheets

36%

26%

Conceded 1st/2nd Half

EUP SER

1H Clean sheet

61%

48%

2H Clean sheet

61%

56%

Conceded Average 1H

0.54

0.74

Conceded Average 2H

0.57

0.67

Statistics of K.A.S. Eupen matches and RFC Seraing matches within the tournament Challenger Pro League.

Goals Handicap Stats

Full time

Handicap

EUP SER

+2.5

75%

70%

+1.5

96%

85%

+0.5

71%

59%

-0.5

39%

26%

-1.5

11%

15%

-2.5

7%

4%

1st Half

Handicap

EUP SER

+1.5

93%

85%

+0.5

71%

59%

-0.5

36%

11%

-1.5

14%

4%

2nd Half

Handicap

EUP SER

+1.5

89%

96%

+0.5

79%

70%

-0.5

39%

37%

-1.5

11%

15%

Goals by minute

Total Goals Scored Conceded

10 mins

EUP SER

0-10 mins

9%

8%

11-20 mins

9%

16%

21-30 mins

12%

5%

31-40 mins

6%

11%

41-50 mins

12%

5%

51-60 mins

9%

14%

61-70 mins

3%

11%

71-80 mins

15%

8%

81-90 mins

25%

22%

15 mins

EUP SER

0-15 mins

12%

22%

16-30 mins

18%

8%

31-45 mins

9%

16%

46-60 mins

15%

14%

61-75 mins

9%

19%

76-90 mins

37%

21%

10 mins

EUP SER

0-10 mins

11%

5%

11-20 mins

5%

16%

21-30 mins

11%

0%

31-40 mins

11%

5%

41-50 mins

16%

5%

51-60 mins

16%

16%

61-70 mins

5%

16%

71-80 mins

11%

11%

81-90 mins

14%

26%

15 mins

EUP SER

0-15 mins

16%

16%

16-30 mins

11%

5%

31-45 mins

16%

11%

46-60 mins

26%

16%

61-75 mins

5%

26%

76-90 mins

26%

26%

10 mins

EUP SER

0-10 mins

7%

11%

11-20 mins

13%

17%

21-30 mins

13%

11%

31-40 mins

0%

17%

41-50 mins

7%

6%

51-60 mins

0%

17%

61-70 mins

0%

6%

71-80 mins

20%

6%

81-90 mins

40%

9%

15 mins

EUP SER

0-15 mins

7%

28%

16-30 mins

27%

11%

31-45 mins

0%

22%

46-60 mins

7%

17%

61-75 mins

13%

11%

76-90 mins

46%

11%

Who will score first?

EUP

32%

Scored first in 9/28 matches.

SER

19%

Scored first in 5/27 matches.

Number of Cards

Total Cards / Match

EUP SER

4

2

2

Total cards per match for K.A.S. Eupen and RFC Seraing at the tournament Challenger Pro League in 2025/2026 season.

Total Cards

Total Cards

EUP SER Average

Over 1.5

71%

81%

76%

Over 2.5

64%

74%

69%

Over 3.5

46%

52%

49%

Over 4.5

39%

48%

43%

Over 5.5

21%

26%

23%

Over 6.5

11%

15%

13%

Over 7.5

7%

11%

9%

Team Cards

Team Cards

EUP SER Average

Over 0.5

71%

85%

78%

Over 1.5

64%

63%

63%

Over 2.5

36%

30%

33%

Over 3.5

14%

30%

22%

Over 4.5

7%

22%

14%

Cards Against Team

Cards Against Team

EUP SER Average

Over 0.5

71%

78%

74%

Over 1.5

50%

48%

49%

Over 2.5

18%

26%

22%

Over 3.5

4%

4%

4%

Over 4.5

4%

4%

4%

First / second half WDL

1H/2H WDL

EUP SER

Win % 1st Half

36%

11%

Win % 2st Half

39%

37%

Draw % 1st Half

36%

48%

Draw % 2nd Half

39%

33%

Loss % 1st Half

28%

41%

Loss % 2nd Half

22%

30%

Current Standings Positions

Overall Home Away

Belgium Challenger Pro League

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
7	K.A.S. Eupen	32	12	11	9	44:36	8	47
11	RFC Seraing	32	8	11	13	37:44	-7	35

• Promotion
• Promotion Playoffs
• Relegation

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
7	K.A.S. Eupen	16	6	7	3	23:16	7	25
10	RFC Seraing	16	5	4	7	24:23	1	19

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
7	K.A.S. Eupen	16	6	4	6	21:20	1	22
12	RFC Seraing	16	3	7	6	13:21	-8	16

Full standings

Performance teams chart

EUP

SER

7 Position 11

32 Round 32

Previous | Next round

Player Statistics

Overall K.A.S. Eupen RFC Seraing

Overview

Shots

Attack

Defending

Goalkeeping

Overview

Player	Grade	Minutes played	Goals	xG	Assists	xA	Total shots	Passes	Yellow cards	Red cards
Kikas Forward	6.2	90	-	0.05	-	0.01	1	5/10(50%)	-	-

xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Shots

Player	Total shots	Shots on target	xGOT	Shots off target	Blocked shots	Shots header	Shots inside the Box	Shots outside the Box
Kikas Forward	1	-	-	1	-	-	1	-

xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

Attack

Player	Touches in the opposition Box	Passes	Big chances created	Big chances missed	Assists	xA	Passes in final third	Touches	Passes long	Crosses	Successful dribbles	Fouled	Offsides
Kikas Forward	3	5/10(50%)	-	-	-	0.01	3/4(75%)	17	-	-	-	-	1

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Defending

Player	Duels	Aerial duels	Ground duels	Foules	Tackles	Interceptions	Clearances	Error leading to goal	Error leading to shot	Own goals
Kikas Forward	8	2/3(67%)	1/5(20%)	2	-	-	1	-	-	-

Goalkeeping

Player	Goals prevented	Goalkeeper saves	xGOT faced	Goals Conceded	Punches	Throws	Sweeper keeper actions

Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.