• Football
• World
• SheBelieves Cup, Women
• USA (Women) x Canada (Women)

USA (Women) vs Canada (Women) 04/03/2026

• 04/03/26 18:45 |
  Round 2
• USA (Women)

  Sentnor A. - 55'
  • 1 : 0
  • Finished
  Canada (Women)

Summary Statistics Lineups Player Statistics

USA

Match details

CAN

1st Half 0:0

37 Alidou d Anjou M. Out: Awujo S.

2nd Half 1:0

55 Sentnor A. Assist: Lavelle R.

61 Huitema J. Out: Regan E.

61 Chukwu C. Out: Prince N.

63 Ward H. Out: Lacasse C.

69 Sears E. Out: Rodman T.

77 Alidou d Anjou M.

79 Heaps L. Out: Hutton C.

79 Yohannes L. Out: Lavelle R.

87 Carle G. Out: Collins S.

88 Carle G.

90 Shaw J. Out: Thompson A.

90 + 3 Pridham D. Out: Viens E.

USA

Match stats

CAN

1.54

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.14

65 %

Ball possession

35 %

2

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

0

18

Total shots

6

4

Shots on goal

1

0.86

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.07

69 %

Ball possession

31 %

1

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

0

9

Total shots

3

1

Shots on goal

1

0.68

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.07

59 %

Ball possession

41 %

1

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

0

9

Total shots

3

3

Shots on goal

0

• 3.5 3.5
• Goals scored per match
• 3 0 1.5

• 0.3 0.3
• Goals conceded per match
• 0.8 1.8 1.4

• 23.7' 23.7'
• Minutes/Goal scored
• 23.5' 50' 31'

• 3.8 3.8
• Match goals average
• 3.8 1.8 2.9

• 38 38
• Goals
• 23 9 29

Show more

Current Form

Last 5 matches

USA (Women)

Canada (Women)

USA

H2H Stats

CAN

All tournaments Olympic Tournament, Women World Cup, Women International Friendly Games, Women CONCACAF Olympic Qualifications, Women SheBelieves Cup, Women CONCACAF Championship, Women Gold Cup, Women 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches 5 matches 5 matches All matches 5 matches 5 matches 5 matches 5 matches

• 100% 5wins
• 0draws
• 0wins

• 10
• Score
• 4

• 1
• Yellow cards
• 4

• 0
• Red cards
• 0

Head to head

World SheBelieves Cup, Women 1

FT 04/03/26 18:45

USA (Women) Canada (Women)

1 0

World International Friendly Games, Women 1

FT 02/07/25 19:30

USA (Women) Canada (Women)

3 0

World SheBelieves Cup, Women 1

FT (P) 09/04/24 19:00

USA (Women) Canada (Women)

2 (5) 2 (4)

World Gold Cup, Women 1

FT (P) 06/03/24 22:15

Canada (Women) USA (Women)

2 (1) 2 (3)

World SheBelieves Cup, Women 1

FT 16/02/23 19:00

USA (Women) Canada (Women)

2 0

Load more

Last results: USA (Women)

World International Friendly Games, Women 5

FT 09/06/26 20:30

Brazil (Women) 4 USA (Women)

0 1

FT 06/06/26 17:30

Brazil (Women) USA (Women)

2 1

FT 17/04/26 21:00

USA (Women) Japan (Women)

3 0

FT 14/04/26 22:00

USA (Women) Japan (Women)

0 1

FT 11/04/26 17:30

USA (Women) Japan (Women)

2 1

Load more

Last results: Canada (Women)

World International Friendly Games, Women 1

FT 09/06/26 21:30

Costa Rica (Women) Canada (Women)

0 6

3

FT 18/04/26 21:30

Brazil (Women) Canada (Women)

1 0

FT 14/04/26 15:00

Canada (Women) South Korea (Women)

3 1

FT 11/04/26 15:00

Canada (Women) Zambia (Women)

4 0

World SheBelieves Cup, Women 1

FT (P) 07/03/26 12:30

Canada (Women) Argentina (Women)

0 (3) 0 (2)

Load more

Match facts

The most common result of matches between USA and Canada is 1-1. 5 matches have ended with this result.

During the last 9 meetings with USA playing at home, USA have won 7 times, there have been 2 draws while Canada have won 0 times. The goal difference is 18-5 in favour of USA.

During the last 22 meetings, USA have won 14 times, there have been 7 draws while Canada have won 1 times. The goal difference is 42-15 in favour of USA.

USA have a winning streak of 7 matches.

USA have won 7 home matches in a row.

Canada have lost 5 matches in a row.

Canada have lost 5 away matches in a row.

Canada haven't won any of their last 6 away matches.

Canada haven't won any of their last 5 games against USA.

When playing at home, USA have not lost to Canada in their last 9 encounters.

USA have kept a clean sheet in 6 matches in a row.

USA have scored at least one goal for 19 consecutive matches.

Canada have not managed to score in their last 5 matches.

Canada have conceded a goal in each of their last 10 matches.

USA wins 1st half in 86% of their matches, Canada in 36% of their matches.

USA wins 86% of halftimes, Canada wins 36%.

The winner of their last meeting was USA.

On their last meeting USA won by 3 goals.

When USA leads 1-0 at home, they win in 86% of their matches.

When Canada is down 1-0 away, they win 0% of their matches.

In SheBelieves Cup, Women, USA has better performance than Canada.

USA's performance of the last 5 matches is better than Canada's.

Canada has streak of 5 matches with 0 scored goals.

USA have lost just 0 of their last 5 games against Canada (in all competitions).

In the last 5 meetings USA won 5, Canada won 0, 0 draws.

USA have lost just 0 of their last 3 SheBelieves Cup, Women games against Canada.

Canada have won just 0 of their last 3 SheBelieves Cup, Women games against USA.

USA scores 2 goals in a match against Canada and Canada scores 0.8 goals against USA (on average).

Average number of goals in meetings between USA and Canada is 2.8.

Average number of goals in the first half in meetings between USA and Canada is 1.2.

USA scores 3.27 goals when playing at home and Canada scores 0 goals when playing away (on average).

More facts

New comments

Add your message

Be the first to leave a comment

See All

USA

Statistics

CAN

Match stats Prematch

Match

1st Half

2nd Half

1.54

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.14

65 %

Ball possession

35 %

2

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

0

18

Total shots

6

4

Shots on goal

1

5

Shots off goal

2

13

Shots inside the Box

2

5

Shots outside the Box

4

2.2

xG on target (xGOT) xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

0.03

9

Blocked shots

3

32

Touches in the opposition Box

16

1

Offsides

2

14

Free kicks

7

11

Corner kicks

2

26

Throw ins

22

502/588 (85%)

Passes

259/328 (79%)

12/36 (33%)

Long Passes

18/39 (46%)

104/158 (66%)

Passes in final third

32/52 (62%)

6/20 (30%)

Crosses

1/6 (17%)

0.83

Expected assists (xA) Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

0.5

7

Fouls

14

0

Yellow cards

2

39

Duels won

35

7/13 (54%)

Tackles

11/21 (52%)

15

Clearances

29

6

Interceptions

21

1

Errors leading to shot

1

1

Goalkeeper saves

3

0.03

xGOT faced xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.

2.2

0.03

Goals prevented Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

1.2

0.86

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.07

69 %

Ball possession

31 %

1

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

0

9

Total shots

3

1

Shots on goal

1

5

Shots off goal

0

5

Shots inside the Box

1

4

Shots outside the Box

2

0.19

xG on target (xGOT) xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

0.03

3

Blocked shots

2

17

Touches in the opposition Box

7

7

Free kicks

2

5

Corner kicks

1

11

Throw ins

10

294/340 (86%)

Passes

124/155 (80%)

9/19 (47%)

Long Passes

10/16 (63%)

66/98 (67%)

Passes in final third

10/21 (48%)

4/9 (44%)

Crosses

0/1 (0%)

0.46

Expected assists (xA) Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

0.07

2

Fouls

7

17

Duels won

19

4/7 (57%)

Tackles

6/13 (46%)

6

Clearances

17

2

Interceptions

12

1

Errors leading to shot

1

1

Goalkeeper saves

1

0.03

xGOT faced xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.

0.19

0.03

Goals prevented Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

0.19

0.68

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.07

59 %

Ball possession

41 %

1

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

0

9

Total shots

3

3

Shots on goal

0

0

Shots off goal

2

8

Shots inside the Box

1

1

Shots outside the Box

2

2.01

xG on target (xGOT) xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

0

6

Blocked shots

1

15

Touches in the opposition Box

9

1

Offsides

2

7

Free kicks

5

6

Corner kicks

1

15

Throw ins

12

208/248 (84%)

Passes

135/173 (78%)

3/17 (18%)

Long Passes

8/23 (35%)

38/60 (63%)

Passes in final third

22/31 (71%)

2/11 (18%)

Crosses

1/5 (20%)

0.37

Expected assists (xA) Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

0.43

5

Fouls

7

0

Yellow cards

2

22

Duels won

16

3/6 (50%)

Tackles

5/8 (63%)

9

Clearances

12

4

Interceptions

9

0

Goalkeeper saves

2

0

xGOT faced xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.

2.01

0

Goals prevented Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

1.01

Home Overall Home Away Overall

10 Matches

9 - Wins

0 - Draws

1 - Losses

10 Matches

9 - Wins

0 - Draws

1 - Losses

6 Matches

Wins - 5

Draws - 0

Losses - 1

5 Matches

Wins - 0

Draws - 0

Losses - 5

10 Matches

Wins - 4

Draws - 0

Losses - 6

Goal Difference

+32

35

3

+32

35

3

scored

conceded

+13

18

5

-9

0

9

+1

15

14

• 3.5 3.5
• Goals scored per match
• 3 0 1.5

• 0.3 0.3
• Goals conceded per match
• 0.8 1.8 1.4

• 23.7' 23.7'
• Minutes/Goal scored
• 23.5' 50' 31'

• 3.8 3.8
• Match goals average
• 3.8 1.8 2.9

• 38 38
• Goals
• 23 9 29

Goals scored

USA (Women) is +29% Better in terms of Goals scored.

USA

2.2 Goals / match

CAN

1.7 Goals / match

Full time

1st Half / 2nd Half

Scored per game

USA CAN

Over 0.5

90%

40%

Over 1.5

50%

40%

Over 2.5

30%

40%

Over 3.5

20%

30%

Failed to score

10%

60%

scored 1st/2nd Half

USA CAN

Scored in 1H

50%

40%

Scored in 2H

80%

40%

Scored in both halves

40%

40%

Scored average 1H

0.7

0.6

Scored average 2H

1.5

1.1

The table is compiled based on the last 10 matches of the teams, regardless of the tournament

Goals conceded

USA (Women) is +125% Better in terms of Goals conceded.

USA 0.4 Conceded / match

CAN 0.9 Conceded / match

Full time

1st Half / 2nd Half

Conceded / game

USA CAN

Over 0.5

30%

70%

Over 1.5

10%

10%

Over 2.5

0%

10%

Over 3.5

0%

0%

Clean sheets

70%

30%

Conceded 1st/2nd Half

USA CAN

1H Clean sheet

80%

60%

2H Clean sheet

90%

60%

Conceded Average 1H

0.3

0.4

Conceded Average 2H

0.1

0.5

The table is compiled based on the last 10 matches of the teams, regardless of the tournament

Goals Handicap Stats

Full time

Handicap

USA CAN

+2.5

80%

50%

+1.5

100%

90%

+0.5

80%

50%

-0.5

80%

40%

-1.5

40%

40%

-2.5

30%

30%

1st Half

Handicap

USA CAN

+1.5

100%

100%

+0.5

80%

70%

-0.5

40%

30%

-1.5

10%

20%

2nd Half

Handicap

USA CAN

+1.5

100%

90%

+0.5

100%

70%

-0.5

70%

40%

-1.5

30%

40%

The table is compiled based on the last 10 matches of the teams, regardless of the tournament

Goals by minute

Total Goals Scored Conceded

10 mins

USA CAN

0-10 mins

8%

8%

11-20 mins

15%

0%

21-30 mins

8%

0%

31-40 mins

4%

8%

41-50 mins

19%

8%

51-60 mins

23%

17%

61-70 mins

15%

8%

71-80 mins

4%

17%

81-90 mins

4%

34%

15 mins

USA CAN

0-15 mins

8%

8%

16-30 mins

15%

0%

31-45 mins

4%

17%

46-60 mins

42%

17%

61-75 mins

19%

17%

76-90 mins

12%

41%

10 mins

USA CAN

0-10 mins

9%

10%

11-20 mins

9%

0%

21-30 mins

5%

0%

31-40 mins

5%

10%

41-50 mins

23%

10%

51-60 mins

27%

10%

61-70 mins

14%

10%

71-80 mins

5%

20%

81-90 mins

3%

30%

15 mins

USA CAN

0-15 mins

9%

10%

16-30 mins

14%

0%

31-45 mins

5%

20%

46-60 mins

50%

10%

61-75 mins

18%

20%

76-90 mins

4%

40%

10 mins

USA CAN

0-10 mins

0%

0%

11-20 mins

50%

0%

21-30 mins

25%

0%

31-40 mins

0%

0%

41-50 mins

0%

0%

51-60 mins

0%

50%

61-70 mins

25%

0%

71-80 mins

0%

0%

81-90 mins

0%

50%

15 mins

USA CAN

0-15 mins

50%

0%

16-30 mins

25%

0%

31-45 mins

0%

0%

46-60 mins

0%

50%

61-75 mins

25%

0%

76-90 mins

0%

50%

The table is compiled based on the last 10 matches of the teams, regardless of the tournament

Who will score first?

USA

90%

Scored first in 9/10 matches.

CAN

20%

Scored first in 2/10 matches.

The table is compiled based on the last 10 matches of the teams, regardless of the tournament

Number of Cards

Total Cards / Match

USA CAN

2

1

1

Total cards per match for USA (Women) and Canada (Women) at the tournament SheBelieves Cup, Women in 2026/2026 season.

Total Cards

Total Cards

USA CAN Average

Over 1.5

40%

60%

50%

Over 2.5

20%

40%

30%

Over 3.5

20%

20%

20%

Over 4.5

10%

20%

15%

Over 5.5

10%

20%

15%

Over 6.5

10%

10%

10%

Over 7.5

10%

0%

5%

Team Cards

Team Cards

USA CAN Average

Over 0.5

30%

40%

35%

Over 1.5

10%

30%

20%

Over 2.5

10%

10%

10%

Over 3.5

10%

10%

10%

Over 4.5

10%

0%

5%

Cards Against Team

Cards Against Team

USA CAN Average

Over 0.5

60%

60%

60%

Over 1.5

40%

40%

40%

Over 2.5

20%

30%

25%

Over 3.5

10%

10%

10%

Over 4.5

10%

10%

10%

First / second half WDL

1H/2H WDL

USA CAN

Win % 1st Half

40%

30%

Win % 2st Half

70%

40%

Draw % 1st Half

40%

40%

Draw % 2nd Half

30%

30%

Loss % 1st Half

20%

30%

Loss % 2nd Half

0%

30%

The table is compiled based on the last 10 matches of the teams, regardless of the tournament

Top Scorers

USA (Women)

Canada (Women)

Goals Goals+Assists Assists Red card Yellow red card Yelow card Own goal

World SheBelieves Cup, Women

#

Goals

• 1 Heaps L.

  MD

  
  1
• 2 Shaw J.

  MD

  
  1
• 3 Sentnor A.

  MD

  
  1
• 4 Thompson A.

  FW

  
  1

No data available

Current Standings Positions

World SheBelieves Cup, Women

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
1	USA (Women)	3	3	0	0	4:0	4	9
2	Canada (Women)	3	1	1	1	7:4	3	6

Full standings

Performance teams chart

USA

CAN

1 Position 2

3 Round 3

Previous | Next round

USA

Line Up

CAN

4-4-2 4-2-3-1

Line Up

Starting

6.8 24 Tullis-Joyce

15 Thompson 14 Sonnett 6.6 4 Girma 7.6  Fox

16 Hutton 17 Coffey 7.6 7 Thompson  Rodman

 Sentnor 16 Lavelle

1 Sheridan

16 Beckie 12 Rose 7.2 14 Gilles 24 Collins

25 Regan 7.5 13 Awujo

7 Grosso 20 Lacasse 6.1 11 Viens

15 Prince

USA

Starting

CAN

Tullis-Joyce P. Goalkeeper Fox E. Defender Girma N. Defender Thompson G. Defender Lavelle R. 79' Yohannes L. Sonnett E. Midfielder Sentnor A. Midfielder Coffey S. Midfielder Hutton C. 79' Heaps L. Rodman T. 69' Sears E. Thompson A. 90' Shaw J.

Sheridan K. Goalkeeper Collins S. 87' Carle G. Gilles V. Defender Rose J. Defender Grosso J. Midfielder Awujo S. 37' Alidou d Anjou M. Regan E. 61' Huitema J. Prince N. 61' Chukwu C. Viens E. 90' Pridham D. Lacasse C. 63' Ward H. Beckie J. Forward

USA

Substitutes

CAN

Dickey C. Goalkeeper Wesley K. Defender McKeown T. Defender Sams E. Defender Heaps L. 79' Out: Hutton C. Shaw J. 90' Out: Thompson A. Jackson R. Midfielder Yohannes L. 79' Out: Lavelle R. Moultrie O. Midfielder Patterson A. Midfielder Joseph J. Forward Sears E. 69' Out: Rodman T.

Burns E. Goalkeeper Dagenais M. Goalkeeper Carle G. 87' Out: Collins S. Courtnall B. Defender Reid M. Defender Levasseur M. Midfielder Alidou d Anjou M. 37' Out: Awujo S. Chukwu C. 61' Out: Prince N. Huitema J. 61' Out: Regan E. Hunter K. Forward Pridham D. 90' Out: Viens E. Ward H. 63' Out: Lacasse C.

USA

Head coach

CAN

Hayes E. Coaches

Stoney C. Coaches

Player Statistics

Overall USA (Women) Canada (Women)

Overview

Shots

Attack

Defending

Goalkeeping

Overview

Player	Grade	Minutes played	Goals	xG	Assists	xA	Total shots	Passes	Yellow cards	Red cards
Fox E. Defender	7.6	90	-	-	-	0.04	-	59/73(81%)	-	-
Thompson A. Forward	7.6	89	-	0.24	-	0.03	3	27/31(87%)	-	-
Awujo S. Midfielder	7.5	37	-	0.04	-	-	2	6/7(86%)	-	-
Gilles V. Defender	7.2	90	-	-	-	-	-	42/47(89%)	-	-
Tullis-Joyce P. Goalkeeper	6.8	90	-	-	-	-	-	39/41(95%)	-	-
Girma N. Defender	6.6	90	-	0.08	-	0.01	1	82/87(94%)	-	-
Heaps L. Midfielder	6.6	11	-	-	-	-	-	11/12(92%)	-	-
Yohannes L. Midfielder	6.3	11	-	0.03	-	0.01	1	6/8(75%)	-	-
Viens E. Forward	6.1	87	-	0.06	-	0.01	2	7/11(64%)	-	-

xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Shots

Player	Total shots	Shots on target	xGOT	Shots off target	Blocked shots	Shots header	Shots inside the Box	Shots outside the Box
Thompson A. Forward	3	3	1.39	-	-	-	2	1
Awujo S. Midfielder	2	1	0.03	-	1	-	-	2
Viens E. Forward	2	-	-	1	1	-	1	1
Girma N. Defender	1	-	-	-	1	1	1	-
Yohannes L. Midfielder	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	1
Fox E. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Gilles V. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Heaps L. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Tullis-Joyce P. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

Attack

Player	Touches in the opposition Box	Passes	Big chances created	Big chances missed	Assists	xA	Passes in final third	Touches	Passes long	Crosses	Successful dribbles	Fouled	Offsides
Thompson A. Forward	4	27/31(87%)	-	-	-	0.03	11/15(73%)	40	1/1(100%)	-	-	1	-
Viens E. Forward	4	7/11(64%)	-	-	-	0.01	2/4(50%)	24	-	-	-	-	-
Girma N. Defender	1	82/87(94%)	-	-	-	0.01	2/5(40%)	96	-	-	-	1	-
Awujo S. Midfielder	-	6/7(86%)	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-	2/2(100%)	-	-
Fox E. Defender	-	59/73(81%)	-	-	-	0.04	9/14(64%)	102	3/10(30%)	-	2/3(67%)	2	-
Gilles V. Defender	-	42/47(89%)	-	-	-	-	1/2(50%)	64	3/4(75%)	-	-	-	-
Heaps L. Midfielder	-	11/12(92%)	-	-	-	-	2/3(67%)	15	-	-	-	-	-
Tullis-Joyce P. Goalkeeper	-	39/41(95%)	-	-	-	-	-	45	1/3(33%)	-	-	-	-
Yohannes L. Midfielder	-	6/8(75%)	-	-	-	0.01	5/5(100%)	10	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Defending

Player	Duels	Aerial duels	Ground duels	Foules	Tackles	Interceptions	Clearances	Error leading to goal	Error leading to shot	Own goals
Fox E. Defender	8	1/1(100%)	5/7(71%)	1	-	1	5	-	-	-
Girma N. Defender	8	2/3(67%)	1/5(20%)	1	-	-	1	-	-	-
Viens E. Forward	6	-	1/4(25%)	1	1/1(100%)	-	2	-	-	-
Thompson A. Forward	5	-	3/5(60%)	-	1/2(50%)	-	-	-	-	-
Gilles V. Defender	4	2/2(100%)	2/2(100%)	-	1/2(50%)	1	10	-	-	-
Awujo S. Midfielder	2	-	2/2(100%)	-	-	1	-	-	-	-
Yohannes L. Midfielder	2	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Heaps L. Midfielder	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Tullis-Joyce P. Goalkeeper	1	-	1/1(100%)	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-

Goalkeeping

Player	Goals prevented	Goalkeeper saves	xGOT faced	Goals Conceded	Punches	Throws	Sweeper keeper actions
Tullis-Joyce P. Goalkeeper	0.03	1	0.03	-	-	2	-

Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.