• Football
• Italy
• Serie A
• Inter x Lecce

Inter vs Lecce 14/01/2026

• 14/01/26 14:45 |
  Round 16
• Inter

  Esposito F. - 78'
  • 1 : 0
  • Finished
  Lecce

Summary Statistics Lineups Player Statistics

INT

Match details

LEC

1st Half 0:0

17 Thuram M.

2nd Half 1:0

56 Frattesi D. Out: Barella N.

57 Esposito F. Out: Bonny A.

57 Luis Henrique Out: Diouf A.

63 Melo Veiga D.

68 Morente T. Out: Sottil R.

69 Kaba M. Out: Gandelman O.

72 Martinez L. Out: Mkhitaryan H.

78 Esposito F.

82 N’Dri K. Out: Pierotti S.

86 Sala A. Out: Maleh Y.

87 Sucic P. Out: Thuram M.

90 + 4 Luis Henrique

INT

Match stats

LEC

1.83

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.49

68 %

Ball possession

32 %

2

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

0

21

Total shots

10

7

Shots on goal

1

0.45

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.16

73 %

Ball possession

27 %

8

Total shots

4

2

Shots on goal

0

5

Shots off goal

1

1.38

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.33

62 %

Ball possession

38 %

2

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

0

13

Total shots

6

5

Shots on goal

1

• 2.5 1.7 2.2
• Goals scored per match
• 0.7 0.8 0.6

• 0.8 0.8 0.7
• Goals conceded per match
• 1.3 1.7 1.3

• 27.3' 36' 31'
• Minutes/Goal scored
• 45' 36' 47.4'

• 3.3 2.5 2.9
• Match goals average
• 2 2.5 1.9

• 33 25 29
• Goals
• 20 25 19

Show more

Current Form

Last 5 matches

Inter

Lecce

INT

H2H Stats

LEC

All tournaments Serie A 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches

• 100% 5wins
• 0draws
• 0wins

• 13
• Score
• 0

• 4
• Yellow cards
• 3

• 0
• Red cards
• 0

Head to head

Italy Serie A 5

FT 21/02/26 12:00

Lecce Inter

0 2

FT 14/01/26 14:45

Inter Lecce

1 0

FT 26/01/25 12:00

Lecce Inter

0 4

FT 24/08/24 14:45

Inter Lecce

2 0

FT 25/02/24 12:00

Lecce Inter

0 4

Load more

Last results: Inter

Italy Serie A 2

FT 23/05/26 12:00

Bologna 1909 Inter

3 3

FT 17/05/26 09:00

Inter Hellas Verona

1 1

Italy Coppa Italia 1

FT 13/05/26 15:00

Lazio Inter

0 2

Italy Serie A 2

FT 09/05/26 12:00

Lazio Inter

0 3

FT 03/05/26 14:45

Inter Parma

2 0

Load more

Last results: Lecce

Italy Serie A 5

FT 24/05/26 14:45

Lecce Genoa

1 0

FT 17/05/26 14:45

Sassuolo Calcio Lecce

2 3

FT 09/05/26 14:45

Lecce Juventus

0 1

FT 01/05/26 14:45

Pisa 1909 Lecce

1 2

FT 25/04/26 14:45

Hellas Verona Lecce

0 0

Load more

Match news

Official: Denzel Dumfries Joins Real Madrid

6 hours ago

Officially: Mkhitaryan Extends Contract with Inter

01.07.2026 08:05

Panathinaikos Sign Ex-Inter Star de Vrij

01.07.2026 02:45

Inter Bids Farewell to Three Defenders

30.06.2026 12:35

Inter Officially Parts Ways with Darmian and Acerbi

30.06.2026 05:40

Official: Inter Parts Ways with Yann Sommer

30.06.2026 05:05

Load more

Match facts

The most common result of matches between Inter Milano and US Lecce when Inter Milano is playing at home is 2-0. 4 matches have ended with this result.

The most common result of matches between Inter Milano and US Lecce is 2-0. 5 matches have ended with this result.

During the last 15 meetings with Inter Milano playing at home, Inter Milano have won 14 times, there have been 0 draws while US Lecce have won 1 times. The goal difference is 41-5 in favour of Inter Milano.

During the last 30 meetings, Inter Milano have won 23 times, there have been 3 draws while US Lecce have won 4 times. The goal difference is 73-18 in favour of Inter Milano.

US Lecce's last away win against Inter Milano was in 2000.

Last season Inter Milano won both games against US Lecce (2-0 at home and 4-0 away).

Inter Milano have a winning streak of 6 matches in Serie A.

Did you know that Inter Milano scores 23% of their goals between the minutes 61-75?

Did you know that US Lecce scores 25% of their goals between the minutes 16-30?

US Lecce haven't won any of their last 6 games against Inter Milano.

When playing at home, Inter Milano have not lost to US Lecce in their last 11 encounters.

Inter Milano haven't scored in 1 of their 9 home matches in Serie A this season.

US Lecce haven't scored in 3 of their 8 away matches in Serie A this season.

Inter Milano's home record this season: 7-0-2.

Federico Dimarco has assisted the most goals for Inter Milano with 7. Medon Berisha is US Lecce's biggest assister (3).

Inter Milano wins 1st half in 49% of their matches, US Lecce in 27% of their matches.

Inter Milano wins 49% of halftimes, US Lecce wins 27%.

The winner of their last meeting was Inter Milano.

On their last meeting Inter Milano won by 4 goals.

When Inter Milano leads 1-0 at home, they win in 91% of their matches.

When US Lecce leads 0-1 away, they win in 37% of their matches.

When Inter Milano is down 0-1 home, they win 22% of their matches.

When US Lecce is down 1-0 away, they win 11% of their matches.

In Serie A, Inter Milano has better performance than US Lecce.

Inter Milano's performance of the last 5 matches is better than US Lecce's.

Inter Milano have lost just 0 of their last 5 games against US Lecce (in all competitions).

In the last 5 meetings Inter Milano won 5, US Lecce won 0, 0 draws.

Inter Milano have lost just 0 of their last 5 Serie A games against US Lecce.

US Lecce have won just 0 of their last 5 Serie A games against Inter Milano.

Inter Milano scores 2.8 goals in a match against US Lecce and US Lecce scores 0 goals against Inter Milano (on average).

Average number of goals in meetings between Inter Milano and US Lecce is 2.8.

Average number of goals in the first half in meetings between Inter Milano and US Lecce is 1.2.

Inter Milano scores 2.18 goals when playing at home and US Lecce scores 0.89 goals when playing away (on average).

Inter Milano have a winning streak of 3 matches.

Hakan Calhanoglu has more yellow cards (4) than any other player at Inter Milano. Esmevanio Kialonda Gaspar has collected 6 for US Lecce.

Inter Milano have scored at least one goal for 5 consecutive matches.

Did you know that US Lecce scores 23% of their goals between the minutes 0-15?

US Lecce haven't won in their last 4 games.

More facts

New comments

Add your message

Be the first to leave a comment

See All

INT

Statistics

LEC

Match stats Prematch

Match

1st Half

2nd Half

1.83

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.49

68 %

Ball possession

32 %

2

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

0

21

Total shots

10

7

Shots on goal

1

9

Shots off goal

2

13

Shots inside the Box

6

8

Shots outside the Box

4

2.06

xG on target (xGOT) xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

0.57

5

Blocked shots

7

38

Touches in the opposition Box

11

3

Offsides

1

14

Free kicks

11

11

Corner kicks

3

25

Throw ins

15

439/516 (85%)

Passes

162/253 (64%)

14/38 (37%)

Long Passes

17/62 (27%)

126/169 (75%)

Passes in final third

34/62 (55%)

11/40 (28%)

Crosses

1/9 (11%)

1.72

Expected assists (xA) Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

0.17

11

Fouls

14

2

Yellow cards

1

65

Duels won

49

9/18 (50%)

Tackles

11/16 (69%)

24

Clearances

46

3

Interceptions

3

0

Errors leading to shot

1

1

Goalkeeper saves

6

0.57

xGOT faced xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.

2.06

0.57

Goals prevented Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

1.06

0.45

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.16

73 %

Ball possession

27 %

8

Total shots

4

2

Shots on goal

0

5

Shots off goal

1

5

Shots inside the Box

3

3

Shots outside the Box

1

0.77

xG on target (xGOT) xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

0

1

Blocked shots

3

19

Touches in the opposition Box

4

1

Offsides

1

4

Free kicks

5

5

Corner kicks

2

15

Throw ins

9

246/282 (87%)

Passes

64/106 (60%)

8/13 (62%)

Long Passes

8/29 (28%)

65/82 (79%)

Passes in final third

16/34 (47%)

4/16 (25%)

Crosses

1/3 (33%)

0.46

Expected assists (xA) Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

0.09

5

Fouls

4

1

Yellow cards

0

34

Duels won

23

6/11 (55%)

Tackles

8/10 (80%)

11

Clearances

23

1

Interceptions

2

0

Errors leading to shot

1

0

Goalkeeper saves

2

0

xGOT faced xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.

0.77

0

Goals prevented Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

0.77

1.38

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.33

62 %

Ball possession

38 %

2

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

0

13

Total shots

6

5

Shots on goal

1

4

Shots off goal

1

8

Shots inside the Box

3

5

Shots outside the Box

3

1.29

xG on target (xGOT) xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

0.57

4

Blocked shots

4

19

Touches in the opposition Box

7

2

Offsides

0

10

Free kicks

6

6

Corner kicks

1

10

Throw ins

6

193/234 (82%)

Passes

98/147 (67%)

6/25 (24%)

Long Passes

9/33 (27%)

61/87 (70%)

Passes in final third

18/28 (64%)

7/24 (29%)

Crosses

0/6 (0%)

1.26

Expected assists (xA) Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

0.08

6

Fouls

10

1

Yellow cards

1

31

Duels won

26

3/7 (43%)

Tackles

3/6 (50%)

13

Clearances

23

2

Interceptions

1

1

Goalkeeper saves

4

0.57

xGOT faced xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.

1.29

0.57

Goals prevented Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

0.29

Home Away Overall Home Away Overall

10 Matches

7 - Wins

1 - Draws

2 - Losses

10 Matches

7 - Wins

1 - Draws

2 - Losses

10 Matches

7 - Wins

2 - Draws

1 - Losses

10 Matches

Wins - 2

Draws - 3

Losses - 5

10 Matches

Wins - 2

Draws - 3

Losses - 5

10 Matches

Wins - 3

Draws - 2

Losses - 5

Goal Difference

+17

25

8

+9

17

8

+15

22

7

scored

conceded

-6

7

13

-9

8

17

-7

6

13

• 2.5 1.7 2.2
• Goals scored per match
• 0.7 0.8 0.6

• 0.8 0.8 0.7
• Goals conceded per match
• 1.3 1.7 1.3

• 27.3' 36' 31'
• Minutes/Goal scored
• 45' 36' 47.4'

• 3.3 2.5 2.9
• Match goals average
• 2 2.5 1.9

• 33 25 29
• Goals
• 20 25 19

Goals scored

Inter is +225% Better in terms of Goals scored.

INT

2.21 Goals / match

LEC

0.68 Goals / match

Full time

1st Half / 2nd Half

Scored per game

INT LEC

Over 0.5

95%

53%

Over 1.5

74%

16%

Over 2.5

32%

0%

Over 3.5

16%

0%

Failed to score

5%

47%

scored 1st/2nd Half

INT LEC

Scored in 1H

74%

37%

Scored in 2H

79%

21%

Scored in both halves

58%

5%

Scored average 1H

0.89

0.42

Scored average 2H

1.32

0.26

Statistics of Inter matches and Lecce matches within the tournament Serie A.

Goals conceded

Inter is +60% Better in terms of Goals conceded.

INT 0.89 Conceded / match

LEC 1.42 Conceded / match

Full time

1st Half / 2nd Half

Conceded / game

INT LEC

Over 0.5

53%

68%

Over 1.5

21%

53%

Over 2.5

11%

16%

Over 3.5

5%

5%

Clean sheets

47%

32%

Conceded 1st/2nd Half

INT LEC

1H Clean sheet

74%

63%

2H Clean sheet

58%

32%

Conceded Average 1H

0.37

0.42

Conceded Average 2H

0.53

1

Statistics of Inter matches and Lecce matches within the tournament Serie A.

Goals Handicap Stats

Full time

Handicap

INT LEC

+2.5

84%

68%

+1.5

95%

68%

+0.5

79%

47%

-0.5

74%

21%

-1.5

47%

0%

-2.5

21%

0%

1st Half

Handicap

INT LEC

+1.5

100%

95%

+0.5

84%

74%

-0.5

53%

26%

-1.5

16%

5%

2nd Half

Handicap

INT LEC

+1.5

100%

74%

+0.5

84%

42%

-0.5

58%

11%

-1.5

21%

0%

Goals by minute

Total Goals Scored Conceded

10 mins

INT LEC

0-10 mins

10%

5%

11-20 mins

10%

8%

21-30 mins

3%

13%

31-40 mins

10%

10%

41-50 mins

7%

5%

51-60 mins

10%

10%

61-70 mins

14%

10%

71-80 mins

8%

23%

81-90 mins

28%

16%

15 mins

INT LEC

0-15 mins

15%

10%

16-30 mins

7%

15%

31-45 mins

15%

10%

46-60 mins

12%

15%

61-75 mins

20%

28%

76-90 mins

31%

22%

10 mins

INT LEC

0-10 mins

14%

15%

11-20 mins

12%

8%

21-30 mins

0%

23%

31-40 mins

12%

8%

41-50 mins

5%

8%

51-60 mins

12%

8%

61-70 mins

14%

0%

71-80 mins

12%

8%

81-90 mins

19%

22%

15 mins

INT LEC

0-15 mins

19%

23%

16-30 mins

7%

23%

31-45 mins

14%

8%

46-60 mins

14%

15%

61-75 mins

24%

8%

76-90 mins

22%

23%

10 mins

INT LEC

0-10 mins

0%

0%

11-20 mins

6%

7%

21-30 mins

12%

7%

31-40 mins

12%

11%

41-50 mins

12%

7%

51-60 mins

12%

11%

61-70 mins

12%

15%

71-80 mins

0%

30%

81-90 mins

34%

12%

15 mins

INT LEC

0-15 mins

6%

4%

16-30 mins

12%

11%

31-45 mins

24%

11%

46-60 mins

12%

19%

61-75 mins

12%

37%

76-90 mins

34%

18%

Who will score first?

INT

84%

Scored first in 16/19 matches.

LEC

42%

Scored first in 8/19 matches.

Number of Cards

Total Cards / Match

INT LEC

3

1

2

Total cards per match for Inter and Lecce at the tournament Serie A in 2025/2026 season.

Total Cards

Total Cards

INT LEC Average

Over 1.5

84%

84%

84%

Over 2.5

74%

79%

76%

Over 3.5

32%

53%

42%

Over 4.5

21%

37%

29%

Over 5.5

11%

11%

11%

Over 6.5

5%

0%

2%

Over 7.5

0%

0%

0%

Team Cards

Team Cards

INT LEC Average

Over 0.5

84%

89%

86%

Over 1.5

32%

68%

50%

Over 2.5

21%

21%

21%

Over 3.5

0%

11%

5%

Over 4.5

0%

0%

0%

Cards Against Team

Cards Against Team

INT LEC Average

Over 0.5

79%

74%

76%

Over 1.5

63%

47%

55%

Over 2.5

21%

26%

23%

Over 3.5

11%

16%

13%

Over 4.5

0%

0%

0%

First / second half WDL

1H/2H WDL

INT LEC

Win % 1st Half

53%

26%

Win % 2st Half

58%

11%

Draw % 1st Half

32%

47%

Draw % 2nd Half

26%

32%

Loss % 1st Half

15%

27%

Loss % 2nd Half

16%

57%

Top Scorers

Inter

Lecce

Goals Goals+Assists Assists Red card Yellow red card Yelow card Own goal

Italy Serie A

#

Goals

• 1 Martinez L.

  FW

  
  17
• 2 Thuram M.

  FW

  
  13
• 3 Calhanoglu H.

  MD

  
  9
• 4 Dimarco F.

  DF

  
  7
• 5 Esposito F.

  FW

  
  7
• 6 Zielinski P.

  MD

  
  6
• 7 Bonny A.

  FW

  
  5
• 8 Mkhitaryan H.

  MD

  
  4
• 9 Dumfries D.

  DF

  
  3
• 10 Barella N.

  MD

  
  3
• 11 Bisseck Y.

  DF

  
  3
• 12 Sucic P.

  MD

  
  2
• 13 Akanji M.

  DF

  
  2
• 14 Bastoni A.

  DF

  
  1
• 15 Augusto C.

  DF

  
  1
• 16 Luis Henrique

  FW

  
  1
• 17 Diouf A.

  MD

  
  1

Load more

#

Goals

• 1 Banda L.

  FW

  
  5
• 2 Cheddira W.

  FW

  
  4
• 3 Stulic N.

  FW

  
  4
• 4 Coulibaly L.

  MD

  
  3
• 5 N’Dri K.

  MD

  
  2
• 6 Tiago Gabriel

  DF

  
  2
• 7 Berisha M.

  FW

  
  2
• 8 Gandelman O.

  MD

  
  2
• 9 Camarda F.

  FW

  
  1
• 10 Sottil R.

  FW

  
  1
• 11 Ramadani Y.

  MD

  
  1
• 12 Pierotti S.

  MD

  
  1
• 13 Siebert J.

  DF

  
  1

Load more

Current Standings Positions

Overall Home Away

Italy Serie A

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
1	Inter	38	27	6	5	89:35	54	87
17	Lecce	38	10	8	20	28:50	-22	38

• Champions League
• UEFA Europa League
• Conference League Qualification
• Relegation

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
1	Inter	19	14	3	2	50:16	34	45
17	Lecce	19	5	5	9	13:24	-11	20

#	Team	GP	W	D	L	G	GD	P
1	Inter	19	13	3	3	39:19	20	42
16	Lecce	19	5	3	11	15:26	-11	18

Full standings

Performance teams chart

INT

LEC

1 Position 17

38 Round 38

Previous | Next round

INT

Line Up

LEC

3-5-2 4-2-3-1

Line Up

Starting

7.1 1 Sommer

7 25 Akanji 7.6 15 Acerbi 8 95 Bastoni

6.8 17 Diouf 7.3 23 Barella 8 7 Zielinski 7.4 22 Mkhitaryan 7.7 30 Augusto

6.9 14 Bonny 6.3 9 Thuram

7.3 30 Falcone

7.1 17 Melo Veiga 7.2 5 Siebert 6.6 44 Tiago Gabriel 6.8 25 Gallo

6.7 29 Coulibaly 6.4 93 Maleh

6.2 50 Pierotti 5.8 16 Gandelman 6.4 23 Sottil

6.9 9 Stulic

INT

Starting

LEC

Sommer Y. Goalkeeper Acerbi F. Defender Akanji M. Defender Augusto C. Defender Bastoni A. Defender Zielinski P. Midfielder Diouf A. 57' Luis Henrique Mkhitaryan H. 72' Martinez L. Barella N. 56' Frattesi D. Thuram M. 87' Sucic P. Bonny A. 57' Esposito F.

Falcone W. Goalkeeper Siebert J. Defender Melo Veiga D. Defender Gallo A. Defender Tiago Gabriel Defender Gandelman O. 69' Kaba M. Coulibaly L. Midfielder Pierotti S. 82' N’Dri K. Maleh Y. 86' Sala A. Stulic N. Forward Sottil R. 68' Morente T.

INT

Substitutes

LEC

Calligaris A. Goalkeeper Taho A. Goalkeeper Bisseck Y. Defender Cocchi M. Defender Darmian M. Defender De Vrij S. Defender Dimarco F. Defender Bovo L. Midfielder Frattesi D. 56' Out: Barella N. Sucic P. 87' Out: Thuram M. Berenbruch T. Midfielder Esposito F. 57' Out: Bonny A. Martinez L. 72' Out: Mkhitaryan H. Luis Henrique 57' Out: Diouf A.

Fruchtl C. Goalkeeper Samooja J. Goalkeeper Jean G. Defender Kouassi C. Defender Ndaba C. Defender Ignacio M. Defender Gorter O. Midfielder Helgason T. Midfielder N’Dri K. 82' Out: Pierotti S. Kaba M. 69' Out: Gandelman O. Marchwinski F. Midfielder Ngom O. Midfielder Sala A. 86' Out: Maleh Y. Morente T. 68' Out: Sottil R.

INT

Head coach

LEC

Chivu C. Coaches

Di Francesco E. Coaches

Player Statistics

Overall Inter Lecce

Overview

Shots

Attack

Defending

Goalkeeping

Overview

Player	Grade	Minutes played	Goals	xG	Assists	xA	Total shots	Passes	Yellow cards	Red cards
Esposito F. Forward	8.3	34	1	0.85	-	0.08	5	5/7(71%)	-	-
Bastoni A. Defender	8	90	-	-	-	0.26	-	66/84(79%)	-	-
Zielinski P. Midfielder	8	90	-	0.05	-	0.66	1	71/79(90%)	-	-
Augusto C. Defender	7.7	90	-	-	-	0.26	-	29/38(76%)	-	-
Acerbi F. Defender	7.6	90	-	-	-	0.01	-	61/63(97%)	-	-
Mkhitaryan H. Midfielder	7.4	72	-	0.17	-	0.08	6	43/49(88%)	-	-
Barella N. Midfielder	7.3	57	-	0.21	-	0.08	1	21/25(84%)	-	-
Falcone W. Goalkeeper	7.3	90	-	-	-	-	-	11/34(32%)	-	-
Siebert J. Defender	7.2	90	-	0.23	-	-	2	13/25(52%)	-	-
Sommer Y. Goalkeeper	7.1	90	-	-	-	-	-	21/24(88%)	-	-
Melo Veiga D. Defender	7.1	90	-	-	-	0.01	-	15/26(58%)	1	-
Akanji M. Defender	7	90	-	-	-	0.06	-	49/54(91%)	-	-
Luis Henrique Forward	6.9	33	-	-	-	0.09	-	15/17(88%)	1	-
Bonny A. Forward	6.9	56	-	0.1	-	0.02	1	11/14(79%)	-	-
Stulic N. Forward	6.9	90	-	0.03	-	0.04	1	14/16(88%)	-	-
Diouf A. Midfielder	6.8	57	-	0.14	-	0.03	2	22/25(88%)	-	-
Gallo A. Defender	6.8	90	-	-	-	-	-	14/24(58%)	-	-
Coulibaly L. Midfielder	6.7	90	-	-	-	0.01	-	25/27(93%)	-	-
Tiago Gabriel Defender	6.6	90	-	-	-	-	-	15/20(75%)	-	-
Frattesi D. Midfielder	6.6	33	-	-	-	-	-	4/5(80%)	-	-
Morente T. Forward	6.5	22	-	-	-	-	-	2/2(100%)	-	-
Maleh Y. Midfielder	6.4	86	-	0.08	-	0.01	2	20/26(77%)	-	-
Martinez L. Forward	6.4	18	-	0.11	-	0.02	1	5/7(71%)	-	-
Sottil R. Forward	6.4	68	-	0.08	-	0.01	3	7/11(64%)	-	-
Thuram M. Forward	6.3	87	-	0.25	-	0.07	4	16/24(67%)	1	-
Pierotti S. Midfielder	6.2	82	-	0.05	-	0.06	2	10/17(59%)	-	-
Kaba M. Midfielder	6.2	21	-	-	-	-	-	7/10(70%)	-	-
Gandelman O. Midfielder	5.8	69	-	-	-	-	-	6/12(50%)	-	-
N’Dri K. Midfielder	-	8	-	-	-	-	-	1/1(100%)	-	-
Sala A. Midfielder	-	4	-	-	-	0.02	-	2/2(100%)	-	-
Sucic P. Midfielder	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Shots

Player	Total shots	Shots on target	xGOT	Shots off target	Blocked shots	Shots header	Shots inside the Box	Shots outside the Box
Mkhitaryan H. Midfielder	6	-	-	3	3	-	1	5
Esposito F. Forward	5	2	0.98	2	1	3	4	1
Thuram M. Forward	4	1	0.09	2	1	3	3	1
Sottil R. Forward	3	-	-	1	2	-	1	2
Diouf A. Midfielder	2	1	0.03	1	-	-	2	-
Maleh Y. Midfielder	2	-	-	1	1	-	1	1
Pierotti S. Midfielder	2	-	-	-	2	-	1	1
Siebert J. Defender	2	1	0.57	-	1	-	2	-
Barella N. Midfielder	1	1	0.13	-	-	1	1	-
Bonny A. Forward	1	1	0.68	-	-	-	1	-
Martinez L. Forward	1	1	0.15	-	-	-	1	-
Stulic N. Forward	1	-	-	-	1	-	1	-
Zielinski P. Midfielder	1	-	-	1	-	-	-	1
Acerbi F. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Akanji M. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Augusto C. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Bastoni A. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Coulibaly L. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Falcone W. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Frattesi D. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Gallo A. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Gandelman O. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Kaba M. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Luis Henrique Forward	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Melo Veiga D. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Morente T. Forward	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
N’Dri K. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Sala A. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Sommer Y. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Sucic P. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Tiago Gabriel Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

Attack

Player	Touches in the opposition Box	Passes	Big chances created	Big chances missed	Assists	xA	Passes in final third	Touches	Passes long	Crosses	Successful dribbles	Fouled	Offsides
Esposito F. Forward	7	5/7(71%)	-	1	-	0.08	4/5(80%)	20	-	-	-	3	-
Thuram M. Forward	7	16/24(67%)	-	-	-	0.07	9/14(64%)	43	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-
Augusto C. Defender	5	29/38(76%)	-	-	-	0.26	7/12(58%)	72	-	1/7(14%)	1/1(100%)	2	-
Bonny A. Forward	5	11/14(79%)	-	-	-	0.02	5/8(63%)	32	-	-	2/4(50%)	1	1
Diouf A. Midfielder	3	22/25(88%)	-	-	-	0.03	11/13(85%)	37	-	-	-	-	-
Mkhitaryan H. Midfielder	3	43/49(88%)	-	-	-	0.08	22/24(92%)	72	2/2(100%)	-	1/3(33%)	1	-
Pierotti S. Midfielder	3	10/17(59%)	-	-	-	0.06	6/11(55%)	46	-	-	1/4(25%)	1	-
Siebert J. Defender	3	13/25(52%)	-	-	-	-	-	48	2/9(22%)	-	1/1(100%)	-	-
Barella N. Midfielder	2	21/25(84%)	-	-	-	0.08	7/10(70%)	39	-	2/9(22%)	-	1	-
Martinez L. Forward	2	5/7(71%)	-	-	-	0.02	2/4(50%)	15	-	-	-	1	1
Stulic N. Forward	2	14/16(88%)	-	-	-	0.04	7/7(100%)	22	-	-	-	1	1
Zielinski P. Midfielder	2	71/79(90%)	1	-	-	0.66	31/36(86%)	95	5/7(71%)	4/6(67%)	3/3(100%)	-	-
Acerbi F. Defender	1	61/63(97%)	-	-	-	0.01	3/3(100%)	74	1/1(100%)	-	-	1	-
Akanji M. Defender	1	49/54(91%)	-	-	-	0.06	6/9(67%)	70	2/4(50%)	-	-	1	-
Kaba M. Midfielder	1	7/10(70%)	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-	-	1	-
Maleh Y. Midfielder	1	20/26(77%)	-	-	-	0.01	4/6(67%)	38	-	-	-	-	-
Sottil R. Forward	1	7/11(64%)	-	-	-	0.01	2/4(50%)	27	-	1/2(50%)	-	4	-
Bastoni A. Defender	-	66/84(79%)	-	-	-	0.26	16/26(62%)	118	1/11(9%)	3/10(30%)	-	1	-
Coulibaly L. Midfielder	-	25/27(93%)	-	-	-	0.01	4/4(100%)	43	1/1(100%)	-	2/3(67%)	2	-
Falcone W. Goalkeeper	-	11/34(32%)	-	-	-	-	2/7(29%)	49	9/32(28%)	-	-	-	-
Frattesi D. Midfielder	-	4/5(80%)	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	1	1
Gallo A. Defender	-	14/24(58%)	-	-	-	-	2/5(40%)	49	1/7(14%)	-	2/3(67%)	-	-
Gandelman O. Midfielder	-	6/12(50%)	-	-	-	-	1/3(33%)	19	-	-	-	-	-
Luis Henrique Forward	-	15/17(88%)	-	-	-	0.09	3/4(75%)	21	-	1/1(100%)	1/2(50%)	-	-
Melo Veiga D. Defender	-	15/26(58%)	-	-	-	0.01	4/7(57%)	54	2/6(33%)	-	-	-	-
Morente T. Forward	-	2/2(100%)	-	-	-	-	1/1(100%)	6	-	-	-	-	-
N’Dri K. Midfielder	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	1	-
Sala A. Midfielder	-	2/2(100%)	-	-	-	0.02	1/1(100%)	6	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-
Sommer Y. Goalkeeper	-	21/24(88%)	-	-	-	-	-	27	2/5(40%)	-	-	-	-
Sucic P. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	-	-
Tiago Gabriel Defender	-	15/20(75%)	-	-	-	-	-	35	1/4(25%)	-	-	-	-

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Defending

Player	Duels	Aerial duels	Ground duels	Foules	Tackles	Interceptions	Clearances	Error leading to goal	Error leading to shot	Own goals
Pierotti S. Midfielder	21	2/7(29%)	2/14(14%)	3	-	-	2	-	1	-
Augusto C. Defender	19	7/10(70%)	7/9(78%)	1	1/4(25%)	2	2	-	-	-
Siebert J. Defender	17	4/7(57%)	4/10(40%)	5	2/3(67%)	-	10	-	-	-
Bonny A. Forward	15	1/4(25%)	4/11(36%)	1	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-
Melo Veiga D. Defender	15	6/7(86%)	4/8(50%)	2	4/4(100%)	1	4	-	-	-
Coulibaly L. Midfielder	12	-	6/10(60%)	1	-	-	4	-	-	-
Bastoni A. Defender	11	3/7(43%)	3/4(75%)	1	2/2(100%)	-	6	-	-	-
Gandelman O. Midfielder	11	2/8(25%)	-	1	-	-	2	-	-	-
Esposito F. Forward	10	3/6(50%)	3/4(75%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Sottil R. Forward	10	-	4/8(50%)	1	-	-	1	-	-	-
Thuram M. Forward	9	3/5(60%)	2/4(50%)	1	1/2(50%)	-	-	-	-	-
Zielinski P. Midfielder	9	1/2(50%)	5/7(71%)	2	1/2(50%)	-	1	-	-	-
Mkhitaryan H. Midfielder	8	1/1(100%)	3/7(43%)	1	-	-	1	-	-	-
Acerbi F. Defender	7	5/5(100%)	2/2(100%)	-	1/1(100%)	-	7	-	-	-
Diouf A. Midfielder	7	1/1(100%)	2/6(33%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Gallo A. Defender	7	1/1(100%)	5/6(83%)	-	2/3(67%)	-	6	-	-	-
Tiago Gabriel Defender	7	1/4(25%)	2/3(67%)	-	1/2(50%)	-	8	-	-	-
Frattesi D. Midfielder	6	-	3/6(50%)	2	1/2(50%)	1	-	-	-	-
Stulic N. Forward	6	1/5(20%)	-	1	-	-	2	-	-	-
Akanji M. Defender	4	1/1(100%)	1/3(33%)	2	-	-	3	-	-	-
Kaba M. Midfielder	3	1/1(100%)	1/2(50%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Martinez L. Forward	3	-	1/2(50%)	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Barella N. Midfielder	2	-	2/2(100%)	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-
Luis Henrique Forward	2	-	1/2(50%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Sucic P. Midfielder	2	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Falcone W. Goalkeeper	1	-	1/1(100%)	-	1/1(100%)	-	2	-	-	-
Maleh Y. Midfielder	1	-	1/1(100%)	-	1/1(100%)	2	4	-	-	-
Morente T. Forward	1	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
N’Dri K. Midfielder	1	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Sala A. Midfielder	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Sommer Y. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-

Goalkeeping

Player	Goals prevented	Goalkeeper saves	xGOT faced	Goals Conceded	Punches	Throws	Sweeper keeper actions
Falcone W. Goalkeeper	1.06	6	2.06	1	2	5	1
Sommer Y. Goalkeeper	0.57	1	0.57	-	1	1	-

Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.