• Football
• USA
• MLS
• Cincinnati x Chicago Fire

Cincinnati vs Chicago Fire 18/04/2026

• 18/04/26 19:30
• Cincinnati

  Barlow T. - 42'

  Evander - 79'

  D'avilla D. - 86' (OG)
  • 3 : 3
  • Finished
  Chicago Fire

  Cuypers H. - 26', 48'

  Zinckernagel P. - 45+5'

Summary Statistics Lineups Player Statistics

CIN

Match details

CHI

1st Half 1:2

7 Gidi S.

11 Barlow T.

26 Cuypers H. Assist: Zinckernagel P.

42 Barlow T.

45 + 5 Zinckernagel P.

2nd Half 2:1

46 Hadebe T. Out: Flores G.

48 Cuypers H.

64 Powell A. Out: Robinson M.

70 Jabbari A. Out: Barlow T.

70 Valenzuela G. Out: Echenique E.

74 Waterman J. Out: Zinckernagel P.

79 Evander

84 Dithejane P. Out: Lod R.

84 Borso D. Out: Dean J.

86 Smith K. Out: Mboma Dem K.

86 D'avilla D.

90 Ramirez B.

90 + 1 Borso D.

90 + 3 Bucha P.

90 + 4 Radojevic V. Out: Haile-Selassie M.

90 + 9 Mbokazi M.

90 + 10 Elliott J.

CIN

Match stats

CHI

4.13

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

1.75

55 %

Ball possession

45 %

6

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

1

23

Total shots

18

9

Shots on goal

6

1.86

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

1.59

50 %

Ball possession

50 %

3

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

1

9

Total shots

15

6

Shots on goal

4

2.27

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.16

60 %

Ball possession

40 %

3

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

0

14

Total shots

3

3

Shots on goal

2

• 2.3 1.3 2.3
• Goals scored per match
• 1.7 1.8 1.6

• 1 2.5 2.1
• Goals conceded per match
• 1.5 1.3 1.2

• 27.3' 23.7' 20.5'
• Minutes/Goal scored
• 28.1' 29' 32.1'

• 3.3 3.8 4.4
• Match goals average
• 3.2 3.1 2.8

• 33 38 44
• Goals
• 32 31 28

Show more

Current Form

Last 5 matches

Cincinnati

Chicago Fire

CIN

H2H Stats

CHI

All tournaments MLS US Open Cup Carolina Challenge Cup 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches 10 matches 15 matches All matches 5 matches 5 matches

• 60% 3wins
• 20% 1draws
• 20% 1wins

• 11
• Score
• 9

• 1
• Yellow cards
• 3

• 1
• Red cards
• 0

Head to head

USA MLS 5

FT 02/05/26 20:30

Chicago Fire Cincinnati

2 3

FT 18/04/26 19:30

Cincinnati Chicago Fire

3 3

FT 05/07/25 19:30

Cincinnati Chicago Fire

2 1

FT 19/04/25 20:30

Chicago Fire Cincinnati

2 3

FT 17/07/24 19:30

Cincinnati Chicago Fire

0 1

Load more

Last results: Cincinnati

USA MLS 5

FT 23/05/26 19:30

Cincinnati Orlando City

6 2

FT 16/05/26 21:30

San Diego FC Cincinnati

3 3

FT 13/05/26 19:30

Cincinnati Inter Miami

3 5

FT 09/05/26 19:30

Charlotte FC Cincinnati

2 2

FT 02/05/26 20:30

Chicago Fire Cincinnati

2 3

Load more

Last results: Chicago Fire

USA MLS 5

FT 23/05/26 20:30

Chicago Fire Toronto

2 1

FT 16/05/26 16:30

CF Montreal Chicago Fire

0 2

FT 13/05/26 19:30

D.C. United Chicago Fire

1 3

FT 09/05/26 14:30

Chicago Fire New York Red Bulls

1 3

FT 02/05/26 20:30

Chicago Fire Cincinnati

2 3

Load more

Match news

Chicago Fire Confirm Lewandowski Signing

29.06.2026 16:35

Lewandowski Eyes Move to Chicago Fire

28.06.2026 15:10

Lewandowski Jets to US for Chicago Fire Talks

13.06.2026 02:00

Chicago Fire - Toronto goals and highlights

23.05.2026 23:30

Cincinnati - Orlando City goals and highlights

23.05.2026 22:30

Chicago Fire vs Toronto: lineups for the match

23.05.2026 18:30

Load more

Match facts

The most common result of matches between FC Cincinnati and Chicago Fire when FC Cincinnati is playing at home is 0-0. 3 matches have ended with this result.

The most common result of matches between FC Cincinnati and Chicago Fire is 2-1. 4 matches have ended with this result.

During the last 8 meetings with FC Cincinnati playing at home, FC Cincinnati have won 2 times, there have been 3 draws while Chicago Fire have won 3 times. The goal difference is 9-8 in favour of Chicago Fire.

During the last 17 meetings, FC Cincinnati have won 7 times, there have been 5 draws while Chicago Fire have won 5 times. The goal difference is 24-24 in favour of FC Cincinnati.

Last season FC Cincinnati won both games against Chicago Fire (2-1 at home and 3-2 away).

Did you know that FC Cincinnati scores 50% of their goals between the minutes 76-90?

FC Cincinnati have received 4 red cards this season. This is the highest number in MLS.

FC Cincinnati haven't scored in 1 of their 3 home matches in MLS this season.

Chicago Fire haven't scored in 1 of their 3 away matches in MLS this season.

Ahoueke Steeve Kevin Denkey is FC Cincinnati's top scorer with 2 goals. Hugo Jean-Marc Cuypers has scored 4 times for Chicago Fire.

FC Cincinnati have conceded a goal in each of their last 5 matches.

FC Cincinnati have scored at least one goal for 6 consecutive matches.

FC Cincinnati wins 1st half in 37% of their matches, Chicago Fire in 52% of their matches.

FC Cincinnati wins 37% of halftimes, Chicago Fire wins 52%.

The winner of their last meeting was FC Cincinnati.

On their last meeting FC Cincinnati won by 1 goals.

When FC Cincinnati leads 1-0 at home, they win in 76% of their matches.

When Chicago Fire leads 0-1 away, they win in 69% of their matches.

When FC Cincinnati is down 0-1 home, they win 20% of their matches.

When Chicago Fire is down 1-0 away, they win 0% of their matches.

In MLS, Chicago Fire has better performance than FC Cincinnati.

Chicago Fire's performance of the last 5 matches is better than FC Cincinnati's.

FC Cincinnati have lost just 1 of their last 5 games against Chicago Fire (in all competitions).

In the last 5 meetings FC Cincinnati won 4, Chicago Fire won 1, 0 draws.

FC Cincinnati have lost just 1 of their last 5 MLS games against Chicago Fire.

Chicago Fire have won just 1 of their last 5 MLS games against FC Cincinnati.

FC Cincinnati scores 1.6 goals in a match against Chicago Fire and Chicago Fire scores 1 goals against FC Cincinnati (on average).

Average number of goals in meetings between FC Cincinnati and Chicago Fire is 2.6.

Average number of goals in the first half in meetings between FC Cincinnati and Chicago Fire is 1.2.

FC Cincinnati scores 1.88 goals when playing at home and Chicago Fire scores 2.36 goals when playing away (on average).

Chicago Fire have a winning streak of 3 matches in MLS.

Chicago Fire have a winning streak of 4 matches.

Ender Jesus Echenique Pena has assisted the most goals for FC Cincinnati with 2. Jonathan Fousseni Bamba is Chicago Fire's biggest assister (2).

Bryan Josias Ramirez Leon has more yellow cards (4) than any other player at FC Cincinnati. Philip Aksel Frigast Zinckernagel has collected 4 for Chicago Fire.

Chicago Fire have scored at least one goal for 5 consecutive matches.

More facts

New comments

Add your message

Be the first to leave a comment

See All

CIN

Statistics

CHI

Match stats Prematch

Match

1st Half

2nd Half

4.13

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

1.75

55 %

Ball possession

45 %

6

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

1

23

Total shots

18

9

Shots on goal

6

10

Shots off goal

4

22

Shots inside the Box

11

1

Shots outside the Box

7

3.99

xG on target (xGOT) xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

2.02

4

Blocked shots

8

2

Hit the woodwork

2

53

Touches in the opposition Box

29

1

Offsides

0

9

Free kicks

11

9

Corner kicks

1

22

Throw ins

16

400/483 (83%)

Passes

318/413 (77%)

24/43 (56%)

Long Passes

17/56 (30%)

117/163 (72%)

Passes in final third

66/101 (65%)

5/28 (18%)

Crosses

2/7 (29%)

2.2

Expected assists (xA) Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

1.32

11

Fouls

9

4

Yellow cards

3

56

Duels won

47

7/13 (54%)

Tackles

14/19 (74%)

12

Clearances

39

7

Interceptions

5

3

Goalkeeper saves

7

2.02

xGOT faced xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.

3.99

-0.98

Goals prevented Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

1.99

1.86

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

1.59

50 %

Ball possession

50 %

3

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

1

9

Total shots

15

6

Shots on goal

4

2

Shots off goal

4

9

Shots inside the Box

10

0

Shots outside the Box

5

2.38

xG on target (xGOT) xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

0.91

1

Blocked shots

7

0

Hit the woodwork

2

23

Touches in the opposition Box

22

3

Free kicks

7

5

Corner kicks

1

7

Throw ins

9

183/220 (83%)

Passes

189/227 (83%)

18/25 (72%)

Long Passes

10/21 (48%)

44/63 (70%)

Passes in final third

38/51 (75%)

1/10 (10%)

Crosses

1/4 (25%)

0.83

Expected assists (xA) Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

1.08

7

Fouls

3

2

Yellow cards

0

23

Duels won

29

4/6 (67%)

Tackles

11/12 (92%)

5

Clearances

13

5

Interceptions

4

2

Goalkeeper saves

5

0.91

xGOT faced xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.

2.38

-1.09

Goals prevented Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

1.38

2.27

Expected goals (xG) Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

0.16

60 %

Ball possession

40 %

3

Big chances Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.

0

14

Total shots

3

3

Shots on goal

2

8

Shots off goal

0

13

Shots inside the Box

1

1

Shots outside the Box

2

1.61

xG on target (xGOT) xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

1.11

3

Blocked shots

1

2

Hit the woodwork

0

30

Touches in the opposition Box

7

1

Offsides

0

6

Free kicks

4

4

Corner kicks

0

15

Throw ins

7

217/263 (83%)

Passes

129/186 (69%)

6/18 (33%)

Long Passes

7/35 (20%)

73/100 (73%)

Passes in final third

28/50 (56%)

4/18 (22%)

Crosses

1/3 (33%)

1.37

Expected assists (xA) Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

0.24

4

Fouls

6

2

Yellow cards

3

33

Duels won

18

3/7 (43%)

Tackles

3/7 (43%)

7

Clearances

26

2

Interceptions

1

1

Goalkeeper saves

2

1.11

xGOT faced xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.

1.61

0.11

Goals prevented Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

0.61

Home Away Overall Home Away Overall

10 Matches

7 - Wins

1 - Draws

2 - Losses

10 Matches

2 - Wins

2 - Draws

6 - Losses

10 Matches

4 - Wins

1 - Draws

5 - Losses

10 Matches

Wins - 5

Draws - 1

Losses - 4

10 Matches

Wins - 4

Draws - 5

Losses - 1

10 Matches

Wins - 5

Draws - 2

Losses - 3

Goal Difference

+13

23

10

-12

13

25

+2

23

21

scored

conceded

+2

17

15

+5

18

13

+4

16

12

• 2.3 1.3 2.3
• Goals scored per match
• 1.7 1.8 1.6

• 1 2.5 2.1
• Goals conceded per match
• 1.5 1.3 1.2

• 27.3' 23.7' 20.5'
• Minutes/Goal scored
• 28.1' 29' 32.1'

• 3.3 3.8 4.4
• Match goals average
• 3.2 3.1 2.8

• 33 38 44
• Goals
• 32 31 28

Goals scored

Cincinnati is +11% Better in terms of Goals scored.

CIN

1.43 Goals / match

CHI

1.29 Goals / match

Full time

1st Half / 2nd Half

Scored per game

CIN CHI

Over 0.5

71%

86%

Over 1.5

43%

29%

Over 2.5

14%

14%

Over 3.5

14%

0%

Failed to score

29%

14%

scored 1st/2nd Half

CIN CHI

Scored in 1H

43%

71%

Scored in 2H

57%

43%

Scored in both halves

29%

29%

Scored average 1H

0.43

0.71

Scored average 2H

1

0.57

Statistics of Cincinnati matches and Chicago Fire matches within the tournament MLS.

Goals conceded

Chicago Fire is +223% Better in terms of Goals conceded.

CIN 2.29 Conceded / match

CHI 0.71 Conceded / match

Full time

1st Half / 2nd Half

Conceded / game

CIN CHI

Over 0.5

86%

43%

Over 1.5

43%

29%

Over 2.5

43%

0%

Over 3.5

29%

0%

Clean sheets

14%

57%

Conceded 1st/2nd Half

CIN CHI

1H Clean sheet

57%

86%

2H Clean sheet

14%

71%

Conceded Average 1H

0.86

0.14

Conceded Average 2H

1.43

0.57

Statistics of Cincinnati matches and Chicago Fire matches within the tournament MLS.

Goals Handicap Stats

Full time

Handicap

CIN CHI

+2.5

57%

71%

+1.5

71%

100%

+0.5

43%

71%

-0.5

29%

57%

-1.5

14%

14%

-2.5

0%

14%

1st Half

Handicap

CIN CHI

+1.5

86%

100%

+0.5

71%

100%

-0.5

0%

57%

-1.5

0%

0%

2nd Half

Handicap

CIN CHI

+1.5

71%

86%

+0.5

43%

71%

-0.5

29%

29%

-1.5

29%

14%

Goals by minute

Total Goals Scored Conceded

10 mins

CIN CHI

0-10 mins

4%

7%

11-20 mins

8%

7%

21-30 mins

4%

7%

31-40 mins

4%

7%

41-50 mins

12%

7%

51-60 mins

8%

7%

61-70 mins

12%

7%

71-80 mins

4%

7%

81-90 mins

44%

44%

15 mins

CIN CHI

0-15 mins

8%

14%

16-30 mins

8%

7%

31-45 mins

8%

7%

46-60 mins

15%

14%

61-75 mins

12%

7%

76-90 mins

49%

51%

10 mins

CIN CHI

0-10 mins

0%

11%

11-20 mins

20%

11%

21-30 mins

0%

11%

31-40 mins

0%

11%

41-50 mins

10%

11%

51-60 mins

10%

11%

61-70 mins

0%

0%

71-80 mins

10%

0%

81-90 mins

50%

34%

15 mins

CIN CHI

0-15 mins

0%

22%

16-30 mins

20%

11%

31-45 mins

10%

11%

46-60 mins

10%

22%

61-75 mins

10%

0%

76-90 mins

50%

34%

10 mins

CIN CHI

0-10 mins

6%

0%

11-20 mins

6%

0%

21-30 mins

6%

0%

31-40 mins

6%

0%

41-50 mins

19%

20%

51-60 mins

6%

0%

61-70 mins

19%

20%

71-80 mins

0%

20%

81-90 mins

32%

40%

15 mins

CIN CHI

0-15 mins

13%

0%

16-30 mins

6%

0%

31-45 mins

6%

0%

46-60 mins

25%

20%

61-75 mins

19%

20%

76-90 mins

31%

60%

Who will score first?

CIN

29%

Scored first in 2/7 matches.

CHI

86%

Scored first in 6/7 matches.

Number of Cards

Total Cards / Match

CIN CHI

6

3

3

Total cards per match for Cincinnati and Chicago Fire at the tournament MLS in 2026/2026 season.

Total Cards

Total Cards

CIN CHI Average

Over 1.5

100%

100%

100%

Over 2.5

86%

100%

93%

Over 3.5

71%

71%

71%

Over 4.5

57%

43%

50%

Over 5.5

57%

29%

43%

Over 6.5

43%

0%

21%

Over 7.5

0%

0%

0%

Team Cards

Team Cards

CIN CHI Average

Over 0.5

86%

100%

93%

Over 1.5

71%

100%

85%

Over 2.5

57%

57%

57%

Over 3.5

57%

14%

35%

Over 4.5

29%

0%

14%

Cards Against Team

Cards Against Team

CIN CHI Average

Over 0.5

100%

100%

100%

Over 1.5

86%

43%

64%

Over 2.5

14%

29%

21%

Over 3.5

0%

0%

0%

Over 4.5

0%

0%

0%

First / second half WDL

1H/2H WDL

CIN CHI

Win % 1st Half

0%

57%

Win % 2st Half

29%

29%

Draw % 1st Half

71%

43%

Draw % 2nd Half

14%

43%

Loss % 1st Half

29%

0%

Loss % 2nd Half

57%

28%

Top Scorers

Cincinnati

Chicago Fire

Goals Goals+Assists Assists Red card Yellow red card Yelow card Own goal

USA MLS

#

Goals

• 1 Denkey K.

  FW

  
  9
• 2 Evander

  MD

  
  9
• 3 Barlow T.

  FW

  
  5
• 4 Mboma Dem K.

  FW

  
  4
• 5 Bucha P.

  MD

  
  2
• 6 Hagglund N.

  DF

  
  1
• 7 Valenzuela G.

  FW

  
  1
• 8 Jabbari A.

  FW

  
  1
• 9 Echenique E.

  FW

  
  1
• 10 Smith K.

  DF

  
  1
• 11 Chirila A.

  DF

  
  1

Load more

#

Goals

• 1 Cuypers H.

  FW

  
  13
• 2 Zinckernagel P.

  FW

  
  5
• 3 Lod R.

  MD

  
  3
• 4 Haile-Selassie M.

  MD

  
  3
• 5 Bamba J.

  FW

  
  2
• 6 Gutman A.

  DF

  
  1

Load more

Performance teams chart

CIN

CHI

19 Position 5

14 Round 14

Previous | Next round

CIN

Line Up

CHI

3-5-2 4-4-2

Line Up

Starting

6.1 18 Celentano

6.2 4 Hagglund 6.4 12 Robinson 6.5 3 Flores

7 66 Echenique 7 20 Bucha 8.9 10 Evander 6.4 11 Gidi 7 29 Ramirez

6.7 17 Mboma Dem 7.4 16 Barlow

8.6 1 Brady

24 Dean 6.5 3 Elliott 4 Mbokazi 6.2 15 Gutman

8.2 11 Zinckernagel 6.5 6 Jonsson Saletros 5.9 42 D'avilla 8.9 9 Cuypers

6.6 17 Lod 6.2 7 Haile-Selassie

CIN

Starting

CHI

Celentano R. Goalkeeper Hagglund N. Defender Robinson M. 64' Powell A. Flores G. 46' Hadebe T. Bucha P. Midfielder Gidi S. Midfielder Evander Midfielder Echenique E. 70' Valenzuela G. Ramirez B. Forward Mboma Dem K. 86' Smith K. Barlow T. 70' Jabbari A.

Brady C. Goalkeeper Mbokazi M. Defender D'avilla D. Defender Elliott J. Defender Gutman A. Defender Lod R. 84' Dithejane P. Jonsson Saletros A. Midfielder Haile-Selassie M. 90' Radojevic V. Dean J. 84' Borso D. Zinckernagel P. 74' Waterman J. Cuypers H. Forward

CIN

Substitutes

CHI

Louro E. Goalkeeper Hadebe T. 46' Out: Flores G. Smith K. 86' Out: Mboma Dem K. Powell A. 64' Out: Robinson M. Anunga B. Midfielder Valenzuela G. 70' Out: Echenique E. Jabbari A. 70' Out: Barlow T. -/- -/-

Cohen J. Goalkeeper Dithejane P. 84' Out: Lod R. Radojevic V. 90' Out: Haile-Selassie M. Waterman J. 74' Out: Zinckernagel P. Pineda M. Defender Poreba D. Midfielder Borso D. 84' Out: Dean J. Oregel S. Midfielder Shokalook J. Forward

CIN

Head coach

CHI

Noonan P. Coaches

Berhalter G. Coaches

Player Statistics

Overall Cincinnati Chicago Fire

Overview

Shots

Attack

Defending

Goalkeeping

Overview

Player	Grade	Minutes played	Goals	xG	Assists	xA	Total shots	Passes	Yellow cards	Red cards
Cuypers H. Forward	8.9	90	2	0.38	-	0.03	4	20/28(71%)	-	-
Evander Midfielder	8.9	90	1	1.31	-	0.97	7	34/39(87%)	-	-
Brady C. Goalkeeper	8.6	90	-	-	-	-	-	21/35(60%)	-	-
Zinckernagel P. Forward	8.2	73	1	1.02	1	0.28	5	20/28(71%)	-	-
Barlow T. Forward	7.4	70	1	0.97	-	0.14	1	16/22(73%)	1	-
Powell A. Defender	7.2	26	-	-	-	0.01	-	19/20(95%)	-	-
Bucha P. Midfielder	7	90	-	0.18	-	0.13	2	35/44(80%)	1	-
Echenique E. Forward	7	70	-	0.51	-	0.47	3	14/17(82%)	-	-
Ramirez B. Forward	7	90	-	0.1	-	0.17	2	33/39(85%)	1	-
Valenzuela G. Forward	6.9	20	-	0.21	-	0.11	1	9/9(100%)	-	-
Mboma Dem K. Forward	6.7	85	-	0.07	-	0.09	2	26/31(84%)	-	-
Lod R. Midfielder	6.6	83	-	-	-	0.07	-	19/28(68%)	-	-
Elliott J. Defender	6.5	90	-	-	-	0.01	-	35/42(83%)	1	-
Flores G. Defender	6.5	45	-	-	-	0.01	-	25/29(86%)	-	-
Jonsson Saletros A. Midfielder	6.5	90	-	0.03	-	0.08	1	47/51(92%)	-	-
Waterman J. Defender	6.5	17	-	-	-	-	-	3/6(50%)	-	-
Gidi S. Midfielder	6.4	90	-	-	-	0.05	-	53/63(84%)	1	-
Hadebe T. Defender	6.4	45	-	0.35	-	0.02	1	28/37(76%)	-	-
Jabbari A. Forward	6.4	20	-	0.19	-	0.02	1	5/6(83%)	-	-
Robinson M. Defender	6.4	64	-	0.18	-	-	1	27/38(71%)	-	-
Hagglund N. Defender	6.2	90	-	0.07	-	0.02	2	46/53(87%)	-	-
Gutman A. Defender	6.2	90	-	0.17	-	0.02	2	28/39(72%)	-	-
Haile-Selassie M. Midfielder	6.2	89	-	0.09	-	0.7	3	23/29(79%)	-	-
Celentano R. Goalkeeper	6.1	90	-	-	-	-	-	23/26(88%)	-	-
Dean J. Midfielder	6	83	-	-	-	0.04	-	20/28(71%)	-	-
D'avilla D. Defender	5.9	90	-	0.06	-	0.05	2	35/41(85%)	-	-
Borso D. Midfielder	-	7	-	-	-	0.02	-	1/1(100%)	1	-
Dithejane P. Defender	-	7	-	-	-	0.01	-	3/3(100%)	-	-
Radojevic V. Defender	-	1	-	-	-	0.01	-	1/2(50%)	-	-
Smith K. Defender	-	5	-	-	-	-	-	7/10(70%)	-	-

xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Shots

Player	Total shots	Shots on target	xGOT	Shots off target	Blocked shots	Shots header	Shots inside the Box	Shots outside the Box
Evander Midfielder	7	2	1.06	3	2	-	7	-
Zinckernagel P. Forward	5	2	0.75	-	3	-	4	1
Cuypers H. Forward	4	2	0.94	-	2	-	4	-
Echenique E. Forward	3	2	0.85	1	-	-	2	1
Haile-Selassie M. Midfielder	3	1	0.03	2	-	-	1	2
Bucha P. Midfielder	2	1	0.59	-	1	-	2	-
D'avilla D. Defender	2	1	0.31	1	-	-	-	2
Gutman A. Defender	2	-	-	-	2	-	2	-
Hagglund N. Defender	2	-	-	2	-	2	2	-
Mboma Dem K. Forward	2	-	-	2	-	2	2	-
Ramirez B. Forward	2	1	0.03	1	-	-	2	-
Barlow T. Forward	1	1	0.99	-	-	-	1	-
Hadebe T. Defender	1	-	-	1	-	1	1	-
Jabbari A. Forward	1	-	-	-	1	-	1	-
Jonsson Saletros A. Midfielder	1	-	-	1	-	-	-	1
Robinson M. Defender	1	1	0.19	-	-	1	1	-
Valenzuela G. Forward	1	1	0.26	-	-	-	1	-
Borso D. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Brady C. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Celentano R. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Dean J. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Dithejane P. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Elliott J. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Flores G. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Gidi S. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lod R. Midfielder	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Powell A. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Radojevic V. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Smith K. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Waterman J. Defender	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.

Attack

Player	Touches in the opposition Box	Passes	Big chances created	Big chances missed	Assists	xA	Passes in final third	Touches	Passes long	Crosses	Successful dribbles	Fouled	Offsides
Evander Midfielder	12	34/39(87%)	3	-	-	0.97	18/21(86%)	73	1/1(100%)	2/14(14%)	1/4(25%)	1	-
Echenique E. Forward	10	14/17(82%)	1	1	-	0.47	8/10(80%)	34	-	1/3(33%)	3/7(43%)	-	1
Cuypers H. Forward	9	20/28(71%)	-	-	-	0.03	4/6(67%)	52	-	-	-	4	-
Zinckernagel P. Forward	8	20/28(71%)	-	-	1	0.28	10/16(63%)	53	1/2(50%)	1/2(50%)	1/2(50%)	3	-
Barlow T. Forward	6	16/22(73%)	-	-	-	0.14	9/12(75%)	32	-	-	-	1	-
Bucha P. Midfielder	5	35/44(80%)	-	-	-	0.13	12/19(63%)	56	3/5(60%)	-	1/2(50%)	-	-
Ramirez B. Forward	5	33/39(85%)	-	-	-	0.17	16/22(73%)	62	-	2/6(33%)	3/3(100%)	1	-
Gutman A. Defender	4	28/39(72%)	-	-	-	0.02	1/4(25%)	66	-	-	2/2(100%)	-	-
Hagglund N. Defender	4	46/53(87%)	-	-	-	0.02	8/10(80%)	72	3/3(100%)	-	-	-	-
Mboma Dem K. Forward	4	26/31(84%)	-	-	-	0.09	10/13(77%)	48	2/3(67%)	-	-	-	-
Lod R. Midfielder	3	19/28(68%)	-	-	-	0.07	6/8(75%)	39	-	-	-	1	-
Valenzuela G. Forward	3	9/9(100%)	-	1	-	0.11	4/4(100%)	14	-	-	-	2	-
Haile-Selassie M. Midfielder	2	23/29(79%)	-	-	-	0.7	6/9(67%)	38	1/3(33%)	-	-	-	-
Jabbari A. Forward	2	5/6(83%)	-	-	-	0.02	1/1(100%)	12	-	-	-	1	-
D'avilla D. Defender	1	35/41(85%)	-	-	-	0.05	11/17(65%)	54	-	-	-	1	-
Dean J. Midfielder	1	20/28(71%)	-	-	-	0.04	6/8(75%)	44	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-
Hadebe T. Defender	1	28/37(76%)	-	1	-	0.02	5/10(50%)	51	1/4(25%)	-	1/1(100%)	-	-
Jonsson Saletros A. Midfielder	1	47/51(92%)	-	-	-	0.08	14/14(100%)	62	1/4(25%)	-	-	-	-
Robinson M. Defender	1	27/38(71%)	-	1	-	-	1/6(17%)	50	1/4(25%)	-	-	-	-
Borso D. Midfielder	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	0.02	1/1(100%)	4	-	-	1/1(100%)	1	-
Brady C. Goalkeeper	-	21/35(60%)	-	-	-	-	-	53	6/19(32%)	-	-	-	-
Celentano R. Goalkeeper	-	23/26(88%)	-	-	-	-	-	36	3/6(50%)	-	-	-	-
Dithejane P. Defender	-	3/3(100%)	-	-	-	0.01	1/1(100%)	5	-	-	-	-	-
Elliott J. Defender	-	35/42(83%)	-	-	-	0.01	2/5(40%)	56	3/8(38%)	-	-	1	-
Flores G. Defender	-	25/29(86%)	-	-	-	0.01	2/3(67%)	35	3/3(100%)	-	-	-	-
Gidi S. Midfielder	-	53/63(84%)	-	-	-	0.05	15/21(71%)	74	5/8(63%)	-	-	1	-
Powell A. Defender	-	19/20(95%)	-	-	-	0.01	4/5(80%)	35	1/1(100%)	-	3/4(75%)	2	-
Radojevic V. Defender	-	1/2(50%)	-	-	-	0.01	1/2(50%)	3	-	-	-	-	-
Smith K. Defender	-	7/10(70%)	-	-	-	-	4/5(80%)	13	1/3(33%)	-	-	-	-
Waterman J. Defender	-	3/6(50%)	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	-	-

xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.

Defending

Player	Duels	Aerial duels	Ground duels	Foules	Tackles	Interceptions	Clearances	Error leading to goal	Error leading to shot	Own goals
Cuypers H. Forward	22	1/8(13%)	7/14(50%)	2	3/3(100%)	1	2	-	-	-
Zinckernagel P. Forward	12	1/1(100%)	7/12(58%)	-	2/3(67%)	-	1	-	-	-
Elliott J. Defender	11	4/9(44%)	1/2(50%)	1	-	-	10	-	-	-
Lod R. Midfielder	11	2/5(40%)	2/6(33%)	1	1/1(100%)	1	2	-	-	-
Ramirez B. Forward	11	-	7/9(78%)	2	-	-	1	-	-	-
Echenique E. Forward	10	-	3/9(33%)	-	-	1	1	-	-	-
Gutman A. Defender	10	1/4(25%)	5/6(83%)	1	2/3(67%)	-	3	-	-	-
Hagglund N. Defender	10	7/9(78%)	1/1(50%)	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Robinson M. Defender	10	3/4(75%)	4/6(67%)	2	2/4(50%)	1	3	-	-	-
Barlow T. Forward	8	1/3(33%)	2/5(40%)	1	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-
Evander Midfielder	8	1/1(100%)	2/7(29%)	1	-	1	-	-	-	-
Haile-Selassie M. Midfielder	8	-	2/7(29%)	-	1/2(50%)	1	-	-	-	-
Bucha P. Midfielder	7	2/2(100%)	3/5(60%)	-	2/2(100%)	1	-	-	-	-
D'avilla D. Defender	7	1/2(50%)	3/5(60%)	-	1/2(50%)	1	1	-	-	1
Gidi S. Midfielder	7	-	2/7(29%)	2	1/1(100%)	4	-	-	-	-
Powell A. Defender	7	-	5/7(71%)	1	-	-	-	-	-	-
Flores G. Defender	6	2/3(67%)	-	3	-	2	1	-	-	-
Hadebe T. Defender	6	2/4(50%)	1/2(50%)	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Mboma Dem K. Forward	6	3/3(100%)	2/3(67%)	-	1/2(50%)	-	-	-	-	-
Borso D. Midfielder	4	-	2/4(50%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Valenzuela G. Forward	4	-	2/3(67%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Dean J. Midfielder	3	1/2(50%)	-	1	-	1	5	-	-	-
Jonsson Saletros A. Midfielder	3	-	1/2(50%)	-	1/1(100%)	1	2	-	-	-
Jabbari A. Forward	2	1/2(50%)	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Waterman J. Defender	2	1/1(100%)	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-
Brady C. Goalkeeper	1	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Dithejane P. Defender	1	-	1/1(100%)	-	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	-
Radojevic V. Defender	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Smith K. Defender	1	1/1(100%)	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Celentano R. Goalkeeper	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Goalkeeping

Player	Goals prevented	Goalkeeper saves	xGOT faced	Goals Conceded	Punches	Throws	Sweeper keeper actions
Brady C. Goalkeeper	1.99	7	3.99	3	-	7	-
Celentano R. Goalkeeper	-0.97	3	2.03	3	-	6	-

Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.

xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.