Australia (Women) vs Mexico (Women) 06/06/2026
Last match Australia (Women) - Mexico (Women) on 09/06/2026
- 06/06/26 05:15
-
- 0 : 1
- Finished
1st Half
0:0
2nd Half
0:1
1.25
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1.59
61
%
Ball possession
39
%
1
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
2
19
Total shots
12
4
Shots on goal
4
- 2.3
- Goals scored per match
- 1.3
- 0.6
- Goals conceded per match
- 0.3
- 31.2'
- Minutes/Goal scored
- 60'
- 2.9
- Match goals average
- 1.5
- 29
- Goals
- 12
Current Form
Last 5 matches
- 5
- Score
- 2
- 0
- Yellow cards
- 0
- 0
- Red cards
- 0
Head to head
FT
09/06/26
05:00
Australia (Women)
Mexico (Women)
Australia (Women)
Mexico (Women)
3
1
FT
06/06/26
05:15
Australia (Women)
Mexico (Women)
Australia (Women)
Mexico (Women)
0
1
FT
09/04/24
20:00
Mexico (Women)
Australia (Women)
Mexico (Women)
Australia (Women)
0
2
Last results: Australia (Women)
FT
09/06/26
05:00
Australia (Women)
Mexico (Women)
Australia (Women)
Mexico (Women)
3
1
FT
06/06/26
05:15
Australia (Women)
Mexico (Women)
Australia (Women)
Mexico (Women)
0
1
FT
15/04/26
10:30
Kenya
Australia (Women)
Kenya
Australia (Women)
0
2
FT
15/04/26
10:30
Kenya (Women)
Australia (Women)
Kenya (Women)
Australia (Women)
0
2
FT
11/04/26
07:00
Australia (Women)
Malawi
Australia (Women)
Malawi
5
0
Last results: Mexico (Women)
FT
09/06/26
05:00
Australia (Women)
Mexico (Women)
Australia (Women)
Mexico (Women)
3
1
FT
06/06/26
05:15
Australia (Women)
Mexico (Women)
Australia (Women)
Mexico (Women)
0
1
FT
07/03/26
18:00
Mexico (Women)
Brazil (Women)
Mexico (Women)
Brazil (Women)
1
0
FT
02/12/25
17:00
Costa Rica (Women)
Mexico (Women)
Costa Rica (Women)
Mexico (Women)
0
2
FT
26/10/25
19:00
Mexico (Women)
New Zealand (Women)
Mexico (Women)
New Zealand (Women)
2
0
Match
1st Half
2nd Half
1.25
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1.59
61
%
Ball possession
39
%
1
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
2
19
Total shots
12
4
Shots on goal
4
9
Shots off goal
8
11
Shots inside the Box
9
8
Shots outside the Box
3
1.03
xG on target (xGOT)
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
1.33
6
Blocked shots
0
45
Touches in the opposition Box
20
1
Offsides
2
3
Free kicks
9
2
Corner kicks
4
29
Throw ins
27
462/542 (85%)
Passes
263/336 (78%)
15/34 (44%)
Long Passes
22/53 (42%)
126/172 (73%)
Passes in final third
48/71 (68%)
5/15 (33%)
Crosses
4/12 (33%)
1.56
Expected assists (xA)
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
1.56
9
Fouls
3
40
Duels won
44
12/16 (75%)
Tackles
14/25 (56%)
25
Clearances
37
6
Interceptions
7
1
Errors leading to shot
0
3
Goalkeeper saves
4
1.33
xGOT faced
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
1.03
0.33
Goals prevented
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
1.03
10
Matches
8 - Wins
1 - Draws
1 - Losses
8
Matches
Wins - 6
Draws - 2
Losses - 0
Goal Difference
+17
23
6
scored
conceded
+8
10
2
- 2.3
- Goals scored per match
- 1.3
- 0.6
- Goals conceded per match
- 0.3
- 31.2'
- Minutes/Goal scored
- 60'
- 2.9
- Match goals average
- 1.5
- 29
- Goals
- 12
Goals scored
Australia (Women) is +83% Better in terms of Goals scored.
Full time
1st Half / 2nd Half
Over 0.5
80%
90%
Over 1.5
70%
30%
Over 2.5
40%
0%
Over 3.5
20%
0%
Failed to score
20%
10%
The table is compiled based on the last 10 matches of the teams, regardless of the tournament
Goals conceded
Mexico (Women) is +60% Better in terms of Goals conceded.
Full time
1st Half / 2nd Half
Over 0.5
60%
20%
Over 1.5
10%
20%
Over 2.5
10%
10%
Over 3.5
0%
0%
Clean sheets
40%
80%
The table is compiled based on the last 10 matches of the teams, regardless of the tournament
Goals Handicap Stats
Full time
1st Half
2nd Half
The table is compiled based on the last 10 matches of the teams, regardless of the tournament
Goals by minute
0-10 mins
9%
0%
11-20 mins
18%
0%
21-30 mins
14%
25%
31-40 mins
14%
25%
41-50 mins
9%
0%
51-60 mins
18%
0%
61-70 mins
5%
0%
71-80 mins
5%
25%
81-90 mins
8%
25%
0-10 mins
13%
0%
11-20 mins
13%
0%
21-30 mins
13%
100%
31-40 mins
20%
0%
41-50 mins
13%
0%
51-60 mins
13%
0%
61-70 mins
0%
0%
71-80 mins
7%
0%
81-90 mins
8%
0%
The table is compiled based on the last 10 matches of the teams, regardless of the tournament
Who will score first?
AUS
50%
Scored first in 5/10 matches.
MEX
0%
Scored first in 0/10 matches.
The table is compiled based on the last 10 matches of the teams, regardless of the tournament
Number of Cards
Total cards per match for Australia (Women) and Mexico (Women) at the tournament International Friendly Games, Women in 2025/2026 season.
Total Cards
Team Cards
Cards Against Team
First / second half WDL
Win % 1st Half
70%
30%
Win % 2st Half
50%
50%
Draw % 1st Half
20%
60%
Draw % 2nd Half
30%
30%
Loss % 1st Half
10%
10%
Loss % 2nd Half
20%
20%
The table is compiled based on the last 10 matches of the teams, regardless of the tournament
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kerr S.
Forward
|
7.9 | 90 | - | 0.58 | - | 0.2 | 5 | 27/34(79%) | - | - |
Carpenter E.
Defender
|
7.8 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.12 | - | 56/59(95%) | - | - |
Foord C.
Forward
|
7.8 | 90 | - | 0.05 | - | 0.44 | 1 | 24/33(73%) | - | - |
Torpey K.
Midfielder
|
7.3 | 84 | - | 0.15 | - | 0.04 | 2 | 31/33(94%) | - | - |
Arnold M.
Goalkeeper
|
7.2 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 33/39(85%) | - | - |
Catley S.
Defender
|
7 | 65 | - | - | - | 0.12 | - | 55/60(92%) | - | - |
|
Bernal Rodriguez R.
Defender
|
6.9 | 90 | - | 0.06 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 29/38(76%) | - | - |
|
Hernandez N.
Defender
|
6.9 | 73 | - | 0.05 | - | 0.15 | 1 | 7/11(64%) | - | - |
|
Raso H.
Forward
|
6.7 | 30 | - | 0.37 | - | 0.31 | 2 | 7/9(78%) | - | - |
|
Kennedy A.
Defender
|
6.6 | 90 | - | 0.11 | - | 0.05 | 2 | 45/59(76%) | - | - |
|
Rule C.
Forward
|
6.6 | 25 | - | - | - | - | - | 15/16(94%) | - | - |
|
Reyes R.
Defender
|
6.5 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 27/31(87%) | - | - |
|
Sayer A.
Midfielder
|
6.5 | 60 | - | 0.01 | - | 0.02 | 1 | 18/25(72%) | - | - |
|
Fowler M.
Forward
|
6.4 | 90 | - | 0.16 | - | 0.34 | 4 | 31/38(82%) | - | - |
|
Palacios Hernandez K.
Forward
|
6.2 | 73 | - | - | - | 0.13 | - | 13/16(81%) | - | - |
Van Egmond E.
Midfielder
|
6.1 | 84 | - | 0.13 | - | 0.13 | 2 | 40/50(80%) | - | - |
Heatley W.
Forward
|
5.5 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 71/76(93%) | - | - |
Chidiac A.
Midfielder
|
- | 6 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 5/8(63%) | - | - |
|
Nevin C.
Defender
|
- | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | 7/8(88%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kerr S.
Forward
|
5 | 3 | 0.77 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | - |
|
Fowler M.
Forward
|
4 | 1 | 0.08 | 1 | 2 | - | - | 4 |
|
Kennedy A.
Defender
|
2 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Raso H.
Forward
|
2 | - | - | 2 | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Torpey K.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | 2 | - |
|
Van Egmond E.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | 2 |
|
Bernal Rodriguez R.
Defender
|
1 | 1 | 0.15 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Foord C.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - |
|
Hernandez N.
Defender
|
1 | 1 | 0.07 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Sayer A.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Arnold M.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Carpenter E.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Catley S.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Chidiac A.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Heatley W.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Nevin C.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Palacios Hernandez K.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Reyes R.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Rule C.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Foord C.
Forward
|
14 | 24/33(73%) | - | - | - | 0.44 | 13/20(65%) | 69 | - | 2/5(40%) | 4/11(36%) | 2 | - |
|
Kerr S.
Forward
|
14 | 27/34(79%) | - | 1 | - | 0.2 | 16/22(73%) | 49 | - | - | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 |
|
Carpenter E.
Defender
|
4 | 56/59(95%) | - | - | - | 0.12 | 15/18(83%) | 92 | - | 2/2(100%) | 1/4(25%) | - | - |
|
Fowler M.
Forward
|
3 | 31/38(82%) | - | - | - | 0.34 | 20/25(80%) | 62 | - | - | 1/6(17%) | - | - |
|
Kennedy A.
Defender
|
3 | 45/59(76%) | - | - | - | 0.05 | 10/19(53%) | 73 | 2/5(40%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Raso H.
Forward
|
3 | 7/9(78%) | 1 | - | - | 0.31 | 4/6(67%) | 15 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Van Egmond E.
Midfielder
|
3 | 40/50(80%) | - | - | - | 0.13 | 16/23(70%) | 58 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Torpey K.
Midfielder
|
2 | 31/33(94%) | - | - | - | 0.04 | 11/12(92%) | 57 | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Bernal Rodriguez R.
Defender
|
1 | 29/38(76%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 5/5(100%) | 55 | 1/5(20%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Hernandez N.
Defender
|
1 | 7/11(64%) | - | - | - | 0.15 | 1/4(25%) | 37 | 1/4(25%) | 1/2(50%) | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 |
|
Palacios Hernandez K.
Forward
|
1 | 13/16(81%) | - | - | - | 0.13 | 6/6(100%) | 24 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Reyes R.
Defender
|
1 | 27/31(87%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 4/4(100%) | 70 | 2/4(50%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Arnold M.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 33/39(85%) | - | - | - | - | - | 46 | 5/10(50%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Catley S.
Defender
|
- | 55/60(92%) | - | - | - | 0.12 | 9/11(82%) | 71 | 3/5(60%) | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - |
|
Chidiac A.
Midfielder
|
- | 5/8(63%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 3/5(60%) | 11 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Heatley W.
Forward
|
- | 71/76(93%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 2/5(40%) | 88 | 3/6(50%) | - | 2/2(100%) | 1 | - |
|
Nevin C.
Defender
|
- | 7/8(88%) | - | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | 9 | 1/1(100%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - |
|
Rule C.
Forward
|
- | 15/16(94%) | - | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | 20 | - | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - |
|
Sayer A.
Midfielder
|
- | 18/25(72%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 5/7(71%) | 32 | - | - | - | - | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Foord C.
Forward
|
21 | 2/3(67%) | 9/18(50%) | 1 | 2/3(67%) | - | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Reyes R.
Defender
|
12 | 1/3(33%) | 3/9(33%) | 1 | 2/3(67%) | - | 7 | - | - | - |
|
Fowler M.
Forward
|
11 | - | 2/10(20%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Carpenter E.
Defender
|
9 | 3/3(100%) | 3/6(50%) | - | 2/2(100%) | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Kerr S.
Forward
|
9 | 3/5(60%) | 3/4(75%) | - | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Bernal Rodriguez R.
Defender
|
8 | 1/3(33%) | 3/5(60%) | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | 6 | - | - | - |
|
Torpey K.
Midfielder
|
7 | 1/2(50%) | 3/5(60%) | 1 | 3/3(100%) | - | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Hernandez N.
Defender
|
6 | - | 6/6(100%) | - | 3/5(60%) | - | 4 | - | - | - |
|
Kennedy A.
Defender
|
6 | 2/2(100%) | 2/4(50%) | - | - | 5 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Sayer A.
Midfielder
|
5 | 1/1(100%) | 1/4(25%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Heatley W.
Forward
|
4 | - | 3/4(75%) | 1 | - | - | 7 | - | 1 | - |
|
Van Egmond E.
Midfielder
|
4 | - | 1/3(33%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Catley S.
Defender
|
3 | - | 1/3(33%) | - | - | - | 5 | - | - | - |
|
Palacios Hernandez K.
Forward
|
3 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Chidiac A.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Raso H.
Forward
|
2 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Rule C.
Forward
|
2 | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Nevin C.
Defender
|
1 | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Arnold M.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Arnold M.
Goalkeeper
|
0.51 | 3 | 1.51 | 1 | - | 3 | 2 |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
